Saturday, July 31, 2021

What next for Haiti after its president was assassinated?

What’s happened?

On 7 July Haitian president Jovenel Moïse was assassinated in his bedroom. Haitian authorities say that a group of up to 28, largely Colombian, mercenaries broke into his home near the capital Port-au-Prince. The president was shot 12 times. His wife was also shot in the attack, although she survived. Police have since apprehended most of the alleged attackers and paraded them before the press. Many details of the murder remain unresolved, not least the reason why the president’s own security detail appears to have offered no resistance to the mercenaries. 

Was Moïse popular?

No. A one-time banana exporter, Moïse had assumed office in 2017. Things got off to a bad start after he was implicated in an embezzlement scandal: at least $700,000 of public money had allegedly been diverted to his banana business. Security worsened during his tenure: most of the country is now too dangerous for foreigners to visit due to the risk of kidnapping. Moïse also had an autocratic streak. He refused to hold new parliamentary elections last year and had effectively been ruling by decree at the time of his death. He also insisted that his term should end in 2022, a year later than the constitution seemed to allow. Moïse had made so many enemies that, as Michael Stott puts it in the Financial Times, it is still “not entirely clear which side his bodyguards were on” during the assassination raid. 

Does the country have a history of this?

Haiti is the only state in the world to have been founded by a successful slave revolution. The country gained independence from France in 1804. Over the turbulent centuries since there have been a few constants: coups, foreign intervention, poverty and some astoundingly corrupt and brutal leaders. The country was occupied by the United States between 1915 and 1934. Between 1957 and 1986 it suffered under the successive dictatorships of François “Papa Doc” Duvalier and his son, Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier. The pair are thought to have stolen hundreds of millions of dollars of public funds. In 1991 Haiti turned towards democracy, but it has been a rocky ride, with disputed elections and two more coups since then. 

What’s happened since the killing?

Moïse’s assassination created a power vacuum, sparking fears that the country was heading for outright anarchy. For now the elite seem to have coalesced behind new prime minister and acting president Ariel Henry. Elections are due in September, although it is anyone’s guess whether they will happen or not. 

But the country is poor?

Yes. With a GDP per capita of just $1,279, Haiti is the poorest country in the Americas and one of the poorest in the world. The World Bank reports that the poverty rate approached 60% last year as the Covid-19 pandemic worsened an already dire economic situation. Two-fifths of Haitians depend on agriculture, making for a precarious existence in a mountainous country that is prone to natural disasters. Textiles make up the bulk of exports, but the economy is overwhelmingly dependent on external help. More than 20% of the government’s annual budget comes from foreign donors. More than a quarter of GDP comes from remittances from the Haitian diaspora, says Rocio Cara Labrador for the Council on Foreign Relations. Millions of Haitians live and work overseas and send money home. 

Why is it so poor?

Some blame a long history of meddling by the US. Others point to its colonial heritage. In 1825 Haiti was forced to pay a 90 million franc (about $22bn today) indemnity to France in return for recognition of its independence. The debt took more than a century to clear. Yet that doesn’t seem to explain Haiti’s current predicament, says Noah Smith in his Substack newsletter. By 1960, the debt was long paid off and Haiti had a similar living standard to the Dominican Republic, its neighbour on the island of Hispaniola. In the ensuing decades the latter grew rapidly and is today “eight times as rich… Haiti’s standard of living hasn’t advanced at all since 1950”. That is one of the most dramatic economic divergences in recent history, “perhaps surpassed only by North and South Korea”. Some blame environmental degradation – Haiti is heavily deforested. Others argue that while the Dominican Republic has had its own share of brutal dictatorship, its leaders were at least more focused on development and less intent than the Duvalier duo on robbing their own people. All of these factors have probably contributed, but “the short answer is that no one exactly knows” why Haiti’s economy has done so badly. 

What should be done?

Haiti needs stable political institutions and an end to pervasive corruption and organised crime. But previous efforts have achieved little. As the Financial Times notes, the country has been “in essence an international protectorate” for much of this century. UN peacekeepers were present between 2004 and 2017, but accidentally helped spread a cholera epidemic. The international community poured in $13.5bn of aid after an earthquake in 2010 that killed 220,000 people and left 1.5 million homeless. The money helped rebuild damaged infrastructure, but it didn’t build the nation’s institutions. Some argue that too much aid creates perverse incentives, encouraging local elites to focus on the demands of foreign donors at the expense of their own people. As Elise Labott puts it in Foreign Policy, for all the “misbegotten aid” that has been sent over the years, “the one thing the world never taught Haiti was to govern – and make decisions for itself”.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/economy/global-economy/603644/what-next-for-haiti-after-its-president-was-assassinated
via IFTTT

Friday, July 30, 2021

The charts that matter: bitcoin rises and a mixed week for tech

Welcome back. 

On the cover of this week’s magazine, we’ve got Japan’s stockmarket and why it is looking promising. Japan offers investors access to the Asian growth story combined with the comforts of investing in a developed market, says Alex Rankine.

Meanwhile, our big investment feature this week is how to profit from pampered pets beyond the pandemic. When widespread Covid-19 lockdowns began, many people bought a pet to survive the lack of human interaction. But “the surge in pet ownership induced by the pandemic merely reinforced a long-standing trend,” says Matthew Partridge.

If you’re not already a subscriber, sign up for MoneyWeek magazine now.

This week’s “Too Embarrassed To Ask” video explains what an “index” is. Even if you don’t invest, you have most certainly heard the term. The best-known indexes tend to be the ones that represent individual countries’ stock markets. Here's what it means and why it matters.

And joining Merryn on the podcast this week is AVI Japan Opportunity Trust’s Joe Bauernfreund. They talk about how the Japanese market is valuable despite being hugely under-researched. Find out what Joe has to say here.

Here are the links for this week’s editions of Money Morning and other web articles you may have missed:

Now for the charts of the week. 

The charts that matter 

The gold price rose a little after the metal had lost a little ground in the previous week.

(Gold: three months)

(Gold: three months)

(Gold: three months)

The US dollar index (DXY – a measure of the strength of the dollar against a basket of the currencies of its major trading partners) fell week-on-week (which partly explains the slight uptick in gold prices.

dollar index

(DXY: three months)

The yield on the ten-year US government bond rose after a weak auction on Thursday contributed to risk-on sentiment.

US 10 year yield

(Ten-year US Treasury yield: three months)

The yield on the Japanese ten-year bond had a volatile week ending slightly higher than where it started.

Japanese yield

(Ten-year Japanese government bond yield: three months)

And the yield on the ten-year German Bund fell too.

German yield

(Ten-year Bund yield: three months)

Copper rose compared to the previous week as investors bet on strong demand for the metal in the second half of 2021.

copper price

(Copper: nine months)

The closely-related Aussie dollar rose a little in the week after the dollar gave up some gains.

Australian dollar

(Aussie dollar vs US dollar exchange rate: three months)

Bitcoin rose in the week after news broke out that Amazon may tap into cryptocurrencies.

bitcoin price

(Bitcoin: three months)

US weekly initial jobless claims fell by 24,000 to 400,000. The four-week moving average was 394,500, an increase of 8,000 from the previous week's revised average.

US weekly claims

(US initial jobless claims, four-week moving average: since Jan 2020)

The oil price rose after US inventories fell below the five-year average.

brent price

(Brent crude oil: three months)

Amazon turned sharply lower after China sparked a wider sell-off and after the company was fined €746m by Luxembourg’s officials for breaching EU privacy laws.

amazon price

(Amazon: three months)

And Tesla rose after posting strong second quarter earnings.

tesla price

(Tesla: three months)

Have a great weekend. 



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/economy/603652/the-charts-that-matter-bitcoin-rises-and-mixed-week-for-tech
via IFTTT

​Weekly Live Market & Trade Analysis

Weekly Live Market & Trade AnalysisIn this week's live market and trade analysis session, we opened the session with a review of timing cycles that are in play for the USD and risk assets. We reviewed trades & positions in the S&P500, EURUSD & Gold, we then moved on assessing the technical price patterns and potential set ups for over 20 charts including the DXY, FX majors, global equity Indices, Commodities, Bitcoin. You can watch the recording here.If you are available 1pm UK time join us every Thursday for actionable market analysis, register here!

from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/weekly-live-market-and-trade-analysis2930"
via IFTTT

Market Spotlight: Trading Canadian GDP

Canadian GDP In FocusWith the BOC the chief hawk among the G10 central banks, the Canadian Dollar is drawing plenty of attention at the moment. With this in mind, today’s GDP release will be closely watched and has the potential to create market volatility on any surprise reading. The market is looking for an unchanged reading of -0.3%, meaning that the bar for an upside surprise is set relatively low. If data come sin above consensus today, this is likely to refocus the market’s attention on further BOC tapering, leading CAD higher in the near term.Where to Trade Canadian GDP?USDCADGiven the Fed’s muted message this week, the monetary policy divergence between the Fed and the BOC is growing, creating room for further downside in USDCAD. Price has now broken below the rising trend line from YTD lows, suggesting the upward correction is over for now and putting focus back on the downside. With RSI turning lower and MACD bearish, while below the 1.2469 level bears can target 1.2368 and 1.2243 thereafter.

from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/market-spotlight-trading-canadian-gdp"
via IFTTT

Two private equity trusts: one to buy, one to avoid

The recent $800m fund-raise by Revolut valued the loss-making digital bank, which was founded just six years ago, at $33bn. 

That’s six times its valuation in early 2020. It’s a stark reminder of the euphoria surrounding tech-related private equity valuations. 

Few ordinary investors will have benefited either directly or indirectly (unless you happened to be one of those who bought and held when the bank initially raised money through crowdfunding sites). 

However, they may have benefited from the huge (but lesser) surges in valuations of other tech-related private equity businesses via two listed funds which floated three years ago: Augmentum Fintech and Chrysalis.

Is now a good time to invest in these trusts, or should you take profits? Let’s have a look.

Augmentum Fintech: a buying opportunity for sceptics 

Augmentum Fintech (LSE: AUGM) initially looked rather too esoteric for private investors. But it has subsequently more than justified the confidence of those who subscribed the initial £94m. 

The trust has returned nearly 45% and has issued additional equity to double in size. The recent 15% drop in the share price provides a great opportunity for the sceptics to jump aboard.

Augmentum Capital was founded in 2010 by Tim Levene, backed by Lord Rothschild. He and his co-founders have an impressive 20-plus year record not just as management consultants but as entrepreneurs, notably having built Betfair into a global business. 

Paul Volcker, former chairman of the US Federal Reserve, said in 2009 that “the most important innovation that I have seen in the past 20 years is the ATM” – but Levene and his team realised that internet technology would have a massive impact on all corners of the financial services sector.

AUGM seeks a portfolio that is diversified both by the market it serves and by the maturity of its companies, which could stretch from venture capital to listed. Levene says, as do others, that “leading fintechs are electing to remain private, leaving public market investors with limited opportunity to participate in exceptional returns.” 

For example, payments company Stripe is now valued at $95bn against an initial funding valuation of $100m while Swedish-based lender Klarna is valued at $31bn against an initial valuation of $11m. Being early to invest can reap enormous returns.

There are 21 investments in the portfolio, the largest being £32.6m in investment platform Interactive Investor. Around 17% of the portfolio is in early stage investments, 18% in mid, and 55% in late stage, with 10% as a cash buffer for unexpected opportunities. 

The portfolio is pan-European but half is in the UK, reflecting UK leadership in the sector rather than manager bias. “Significant businesses are being built in Scandinavia and the Netherlands and then globalised”, says Levene to reinforce the point.

One holding, Dext, was sold after about a year, generating an annual rate of return of 31%. The buyer was HGT, which suggests that there was much more to go for – but Levene says that influence over the company was limited and he wanted to show that “realisations are an important part of the story.”

AUGM targets a 20% annualised rate of return and has achieved 19% so far. This is impressive for a portfolio that is immature, presumably conservatively valued, and with little benefit from uplift on disposals. 

The pipeline of opportunities is “very significant”, with £920m live and £144m being actively pursued. Hence AUGM has recently raised another £55m from investors, which accounts for the drop in the share price.

Competition mainly comes from larger investors, such as HGT and Draper Esprit, but they invest at a later stage in a broader universe. The rapid growth and evolution of the fintech sector is shown by global funding in the first quarter of this year of $29bn, which exceeded the totals for the whole of 2016 and 2017. 

The pandemic has accelerated the adoption of technology – 74% of UK consumers are now using less cash and 20% of daily trading volume on the US stockmarket is now accounted for by retail investors. 

Levene points out that 12% of the UK population has downloaded an online banking app for the first time during lockdown. There are still nearly 10,000 bank branches in the UK, down from over 20,000 in the mid 1980s, but most of them are now smaller and emptier. 

The move of financial services online and the disintermediation of salesmen posing as advisers has much further to go, aided by technology and innovation that Volcker couldn’t have imagined just 12 years ago. While the sector giants of yesterday struggle to adapt and compete, Levene and his team are finding the entrepreneurs cutting the ground from beneath their feet.

Chrysalis: buyer beware

Chrysalis (LSE: CHRY) has been an extraordinary success story. It raised £100m at flotation at £1 a share to invest in “crossover” opportunities. Its share price is now 240p, 10% below a recent high, and its market value, after several further equity issues, is £1.3bn. 

The last published net asset value (as of 31 March) is only 206p. But a flurry of good news, such as the recent flotation of Wise, makes it inevitable that the next quarterly number will be significantly higher.

The inspiration for the trust came from Richard Watts and Nick Williamson, managers of Merian’s (now part of Jupiter) small and mid-cap funds. They recognised that a growing proportion of their performance was coming from newly listed companies such as Boohoo, Fever Tree and Blue Prism – yet these companies were staying private for longer, resulting in more of the benefit of early-stage growth accruing to private equity investors. 

Like Baillie Gifford and others, they realised that the solution was to invest in these companies when they were unlisted and hold them through flotation – “crossover” investing. This they could not do in their open-ended funds.

Unlike conventional private equity managers, crossover investors do not seek to control, manage or advise the companies they invest in – they simply tag along for the ride, providing passive equity to private companies intending to float in 2-5 years’ time. 

Chrysalis expects to continue holding its private equity investments after flotation but doesn’t buy listed equities. Given the speed of its investment after the trust’s launch, it clearly had a shopping list ready, investing 65% of the money raised within three months.

This has brought early success. Shares in The Hut Group (an e-commerce company – “we build brands”) soared after its September 2020 flotation, while Wise (formerly Transferwise), which provides online money transfers, floated a few weeks ago. It is now valued at £9.5bn compared with a £4bn valuation in July last year.  

Klarna (online payments offering credit to buyers) is expected to float soon. CHRY has just increased its investment in Starling, the online challenger bank. Wefox, the insurance technology start-up, has recently raised $650m at a $3bn valuation, almost double that in December 2019. You & Mr Jones, “the world’s first global brandtech company” (providing digital and mobile technology for marketers) raised $260m in January to value it at $1.3bn.

These six companies account for nearly 70% of the portfolio and Watts & Williamson report strong progress in all of them.  With the intention of issuing further equity, they have indicated a pipeline of 13 opportunities requiring over £1bn in total as well as £250m of follow-on opportunities, including the recent £35m in Starling. 

The focus is on tech-enabled disrupters rapidly scaling their businesses at the expense of established companies. Early scepticism that they had the network to give access to the best opportunities has been confounded. So what can possibly go wrong?

The potential drawbacks

Watts & Williamson have not had a crisis or  setback in any investment and, without managerial control or private equity experience, it is impossible to know how they would react to a problem;  everybody learns more from their mistakes than from their successes. CHRY’s investments are large, over 15% of the portfolio in at least two cases, so it is vulnerable to problems. Scottish Mortgage’s exposure to Wise and You & Mr Jones is much smaller.

Tom Slater, manager of Baillie Gifford’s Scottish Mortgage Trust, has expressed concern that the aggressive pace of recent flotations is encouraging companies to list too early in their development. They should be thinking longer term and building resilience into their business models. 

The prospect of early flotations may be encouraging crossover investors to overpay, encouraging over-confidence by company managements. Older investors will remember the TMT (technology media and telecoms) bubble of the late 1990s in which companies progressed from start-up to FTSE 100 (or their overseas equivalent) at break-neck speed, supported by impressive financial and business progress, only to then implode. 

Could history repeat itself?

Banking is a mature, highly competitive industry. Does Starling (or Metro, Resolut and Monzo) really have a sustainable edge? They have a proven ability to gain customers but will the services they offer be sufficiently profitable? 

The Hut Group resembles an online Woolworths rather than a haven of quality brands. What does Klarna do that Visa, Mastercard or Apple Pay don’t? The tech boom has fostered many great businesses, but life will be tougher for the next generation.

Caveat emptor.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/funds/investment-trusts/603649/two-private-equity-trusts-one-to-buy-one-to-avoid
via IFTTT

HSBC – Earnings Preview

HSBC, Weekly

HSBC Group is considered the largest European bank by assets; however, in recent months it has been affected and under pressure from the tensions it maintains with China and the United States, after apparently declaring itself to be in favour of the Hong Kong security law that seeks to contribute to a stable environment for businesses and strengthen the confidence of investors. Just today, the first Hong Kong resident has been jailed for 9 years for “terrorist activities and inciting secession”. The long-term outlook for the city’s legal and financial framework remain very much in focus.

Given the statements of the president of HSBC where he assured the bank would resume the payment of dividends as soon as possible, the bank’s shares rose 4%. He also said the yield could help to obtain positive returns with a meager dividend of $0.22, offering yields of around 4% at current prices. This positive outlook for the bank could be linked to the increase in the participation of its main shareholders Ping An Asset Management, which has been active since September last year.

For its part, and due to the transition that many banks have decided to initiate towards online banking due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the bank has mentioned that it plans to gradually reduce its investment banking operations and significantly revise its operations in the United States and Europe which would see the headcount reduced by 35,000 with further focus on its main Asia businesses.

This week peers in Europe (Lloyds¹, Barclays², Nat West and UniCredit) have reported good numbers, HSBC report on Monday august 2. Market expectations are for HSBC to follow, although the share price has been in a tailspin for some time. & of 21 analysts have the stock as a Buy or strong buy with 5 of 21 recommending an Underperform or Sell option. Target prices range hugely and the share price reflects that wide range. The 52-week range has been down to 2.40 and as high as 4.62 following the Q1 job cut announcement. Today (July 30) the shares opened lower at 3.9660.

Technically, the share price has been trending lower from the last 2 months, breaking the 21-day EMA on June 4 at 4.434, breaching the key 4.00 level July 17, and has struggled to hold this level in the subsequent 9 trading days ahead on the Earnings release. News flow has been negative too over the last few weeks not adding to investor sentiment.³ Should the import psychological 4.00 level not hold then the next major support levels sit at 3.75, 3.50 and 3.25, round numbers and the key 38.2, 50.0 and 61.8 Fibonacci levels. If 4.00 proves support the resistance will be found at 4.07 (Daily 21 EMA) 4.20 (Weekly 21EMA), 4.35 and the 2021 high at 4.62.

¹https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/lloyds-bank-hy-q2-profit-revenue-dividend-embark-071527699.html

²https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/barclays-hy-2021-results-profit-revenue-jes-staley-equities-investment-bank-072510493.html

³https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/hsbc-faces-questions-over-disclosure-150005127.html

Click here to access our Economic Calendar

Stuart Cowell 

Head Market Analyst

Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.



from HF Analysis /257894/
via IFTTT

Market Spotlight: Trading US July PCE

US PCE Up NextOn the back of a lacklustre FOMC and a disappointing GDP release this week, the Dollar is on the back foot heading into today’s release. PCE data is key to the Fed’s inflation calculation and so the release holds the potential to cause market volatility. However, given the Fed’s message earlier in the week, it would take a dramatic upside beat to cause any USD rally today. With this in mind, the better opportunities will likely be found in selling USD should data undershoot expectations.Where to Trade US PCE?USDJPYUSDJPY is sitting on a ledge of support at the 109.42 level. The correction from recent highs has been fairly laboured, suggesting room for a continuation lower. However, should data disappoint today there is room for a drop lower to clear out any built up stops. Should price break below the 109.2 level, bears can look for a test of the 107.91 level next.

from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/market-spotlight-trading-us-july-pce"
via IFTTT

Events to Look Out for Next Week

  • Manufacturing PMI (CNY, GMT 01:45) – The Caixin Manufacturing PMI is expected to slightly incline to 51.0 in July from 51.3, confirming a slowdown of the recovery as there are signs of the deceleration in activity, in China and the US.
  • Manufacturing PMI (EUR, GMT 07:55)– The German Manufacturing PMI for July is seen unchanged at 65.6.
  • Manufacturing PMI (GBP, GMT 08:30)– The Manufacturing PMI for July is seen unchanged at 60.4.
  • ISM Manufacturing PMI (USD, GMT 14:00)– The ISM index is expected to tick down to 60.5 from 60.6 in June and an 18-year high of 64.7 in March, versus an 11-year low of 41.5 in April of 2020, and an all-time low of 30.3 in June of 1980.

Tuesday – 03 August 2021


  • Interest Rate Decision and Statement (AUD, GMT 04:30)  After July’s data amd  more precisely the jump on Q2 inflation, there are speculations that the RBA could retain its dovish camp, which continues to argue that the current uptrend in inflation, not just in Australia, is largely due to transitory factors. Against the background of concern that virus developments and containment measures in a country with low vaccination rates will hit growth in the third quarter.

Wednesday – 04 August  2021


  • Services and Composite PMI (GBP, GMT 08:30) –In the UK, the preliminary PMIs came in much weaker than expected as virus disruptions hit confidence. The UK Composite PMI  ast week dropped to a 4-montsh low of 57.7 in the flash reading, from 62.2 in June. Services and manufacturing PMIs were both at 4-months lows, at 57.8 and 60.4 respectively. Still high readings that signal ongoing growth, but the slowdown compared to June is palpable, “with survey respondents widely reporting staff and raw material shortages due to the pandemic”. Concern about the loss of momentum contributed to the lowest degree of optimism on the outlook for nine months.
  • ADP Employment Change (USD, GMT 12:15) – The key private payrolls number is expected to grow by  600K ( last month’s 692K reading).
  • ISM Non- Manufacturing PMI (USD, GMT 14:00)– The ISM-NMI index is expected to rise to 61.0 from 60.1 in June, 64.0 in May, and 62.7 in April. The runup through May left the four highest readings in history. We saw an 11-year low of 41.8 in April of 2020, and an all-time low of 37.8 in November of 2008.

Thursday – 22 July 2021


  • Interest rate Decision, MPC Voting & Monetary Policy (GBP, GMT 11:00)  The sharp week-on-week drop in Covid cases in the UK and the IMF’s sharp upward revision in its UK growth forecast for 2021 have underpinned UK economic forecasts and sterling this week. The IMF, to recap, is expecting UK growth of 7.0% this year, which is their joint fastest growth projection out of the major advanced economies. Note that sterling markets are discounting a 15 bp BoE rate hike for May 2022, following by a 25 bp hike in May 2023. The general expectation is that the BoE will tacitly cement this expectation via upgraded growth and inflation forecasts at its quarterly Monetary Policy Review, which will be published after the Monetary Policy Committee meeting next week, although the Old Lady’s guidance can be expected to remain cautiously dovish for now.

Friday – 23 July 2021


  • Event of the Week – Non-Farm Payrolls (USD, GMT 12:30) – A 600k July nonfarm payroll increase is anticipated, after gains of 850k in June and 583k in May. Jobless rate should drop to 5.6% from 5.9% in June and 5.8% in May. Hours-worked are assumed to rise 0.7% after a 0.2% June increase, while the workweek ticks up to 34.8 from 34.7 in June. Average hourly earnings are assumed to rise 0.3% after gains of 0.3% in June and 0.4% in May, as minimum wage workers have been slow to return to the work force. In the last expansion we saw a 3.5% peak for y/y wage gains, in both February and July of 2019, before the pandemic-boost to an 8.0% peak in April of 2020. The markets forecast a robust payroll trajectory in 2021 following the winter lull, thanks to stimulus deposits and vaccines.
  • Labour Market Data (CAD, GMT 12:30) – Canadian employment surged 231.0k in June, much stronger than forecast, following the -68.0k drop in May. The report reflected a lot of the distortions from the pandemic, the lockdowns on the third wave of covid, and the lifting of some restrictions. With the June gains, the economy has now recovered 2.65 mln workers of the -3 mln lost on the pandemic. The labour situation was helped by some reopenings in the economy.

Click here to access our Economic Calendar

Andria Pichidi 

Market Analyst

Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.



from HF Analysis /258127/
via IFTTT

FOMO Friday: Gold Prices Break Higher

As we wind down into another weekend it’s time to take stock of the week’s winners and losers. Friday’s can be a time of celebration or commiseration depending on your performance. However, one area that always interests me particularly, if talking with traders about the trades they missed. It seems to be that the idea of a missed opportunity provokes an even greater response than a win or a loss. So, this week it seems that the move most people are talking about is the upward move in gold. After stagnating recently, gold prices jumped over 2% this week. So, let’s take a look at what caused this move and why it was a great trade.What Caused the Move?Fed Holds Firm At FOMCThe main catalyst behind the pop higher in gold this week, was the sell of fin the US Dollar. You have to feel slightly sorry for Dollar bulls at the moment because it really feels like one step forward and two steps back. Ahead of the July FOMC, the market was firmly expecting a hawkish signal from the Fed. On the back of a slew of positive data and with vaccination rates and reopening both showing solid progress, USD upside positioning has been gradually building again.However, in an admirable show of consistency, the Fed once again stuck to its guns reaffirming its view that any spike in inflation will prove transitory and as such, won’t require a shift in policy. While the Fed acknowledged that there had been progress in the economy it reiterated its message that there is still a great deal of further progress needed before tapering will be necessary.US GDP Misses MarkFollowing the FOMC meeting, which saw USD down and gold higher, the market received an almost immediate confirmation of Powell’s message. Advance quarterly GDP came in well below expectations at just 6.5%, almost 2% lower than forecast. This proved enough to put an end to any near-term USD bullishness. With the market now no longer expecting any tightening over the summer, there is plenty of room for USD to unwind further, sending gold higher. So, if you caught the move, well done! And if not, there’s always next week. Let’s take a look at the technical picture.Technical ViewsGoldThe rally in gold this week has seen the market trading back up to test the 1826.71 level and bear channel top. With RSI and MACD both bullish here, the focus is on a break higher with a continuation above this level putting the focus on 1871.04 and 1919.92 next. To the downside, 1763.88 remains the key support to note.

from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/fomo-friday-gold-prices-break-higher"
via IFTTT

How to profit from pampered pets beyond the pandemic

As soon as lockdown began in early 2020, millions of people worldwide decided to invest in a furry friend to replace the humans they were banned from seeing. Giles Money of Sarasin & Partners notes that in 2020 the percentage of US households with a pet jumped from 52% to 56%. However, the surge in pet ownership induced by the pandemic merely reinforced a long-standing trend. 

Even with most restrictions now over, the market should continue to expand for years. Longer life expectancy, demographic and cultural changes, and our growing tendency to treat pets as little humans should all ensure that the global pet industry will continue to expand by around 8%-9% a year.

The surge in ownership

The growth in the pet population in the US and other major markets has been greatly accelerated by Covid-19, says Daniel Miller, portfolio manager of the Gabelli Pet Parents Fund. The isolation caused by lockdowns created a “need for companionship”. People were at home far more than usual, so those who had been putting off pet ownership because they were worried about leaving an animal alone all day were now able to care for one. The rise of online e-commerce also “made it easier to buy pet accessories and food”.

The pandemic-induced rise in pet ownership is an intensification of a trend that long predates Covid-19. “People are now much more aware of the enormous health and emotional benefits to having a pet.” Even the oft-mocked cat pictures and videos on Facebook, YouTube and Instagram are encouraging younger consumers to get a canine or feline companion.

Miller notes that pet ownership is now particularly popular with those in their 20s and 30s, especially since people in these age groups “are delaying marriage and having children”. Even those who are married or living together are finding that they can “get great pleasure from owning a pet”. One statistic that Miller thinks really underlines this cultural shift comes from the fact that in 2020, “85 million [American] households had a pet, compared with only 45 million who had a child under 25”.

The trend is particularly advanced in the US and UK, which both have higher per-capita levels of pet ownership than the rest of the world. However, the “rest of the world is starting to catch up”. Even in developing countries, where the idea of having animals as companions was once seen as alien, younger people are starting to embrace pet ownership. 

This is partly driven by cultural changes caused by exposure to images of pet ownership on television and social media, but another reason is that the emerging middle classes “now have more disposable income to spend on pets”. Mike Iddon, chief financial officer of retailer Pets at Home, agrees that there has been a big explosion in pet ownership in the past few years, with “demand greatly exceeding supply” in the UK during the pandemic. He estimates that three million pets have been acquired in Britain during this period. Cats and dogs comprise the lion’s share. But the numbers of fish sold has also risen sharply “after a steady period”, while children’s pets, such as guinea pigs and hamsters, have also been “incredibly popular”.

“Humanising” pets

People are not only more likely to own a pet these days, says Iddon, but they are also treating them differently. A growing tendency to humanise, or anthropomorphise, their pets means people are increasingly likely to consider them “part of the family”. This is good news for companies such as Pets at Home: “if you can win over a pet owner” and retain their loyalty through good service, “you can enjoy their business for the lifespan of the animal”.

Of course, this presents a challenge as well as an opportunity. Securing consumers’ loyalty is not necessarily easy given their “increasingly high” expectations, especially when it comes to “more advanced products”. The good news is that there has recently been “a lot of innovation” in this area. 

To take one example, dog bedding has advanced tremendously from the blankets and pet basket that used to be the norm only a few years ago. Now, you can find bedding that is “self-warming”. The sophistication of dog leads has also greatly improved in the last few years.

In the longer run, Iddon sees some human technology crossing over into the animal sphere, especially in the areas of fitness and nutrition. Pets at Home, for instance, sells a range of “dog-activity monitors”. These devices provide security and allow owners to ensure that their dogs are getting enough exercise – in the same way that humans use Fitbits.

Fine dining, not just fuel

People’s growing pursuit of healthy nutrition has also led to a change in the market for pet food. The large pet-food manufacturers who dominate the sector have hitherto generally focused on producing food for the budget-conscious owner. 

This food, known in the business as “kibble”, relies on keeping costs low by using the cheapest ingredients as well as additives to bulk it up. However, there is an increasing awareness among pet owners that “cats and dogs can survive on the cheapest food, but not thrive”, says Mark Scott, CEO of pet-food subscription service Bella & Duke.

Pet owners are being convinced through social media and word of mouth that “good-quality food is just as important for animals as for humans”, especially as they get older and more prone to disease, says Scott. Feeding animals cheap food “is like putting diesel in a Ferrari”. There’s also a strong economic case for spending a little more on food, since reducing vets’ bills by introducing a better diet can make the supposedly cheaper alternatives a “false economy”. As a result, the large pet-food conglomerates are increasingly under pressure as consumers shift towards premium brands and specially formulated food.

Indeed, the rise in pet ownership among millennials and “Generation Z” is already starting to transform the pet-food industry, says Lucy McKinna, creator of vegan pet food brand Noochy Poochy. Not only do these owners want to make sure that their pets have the healthiest diet possible, but they are also willing to “dig deeper into their pockets for food that will make a difference, in terms of the wider environment”. Five years ago McKinna, who owns a “food-obsessed rescue Doberman”, came up with the idea for a vegan pet-food brand on the basis that it would “align better with my ethics”.

Pet food goes green

However, while her dog loved it, and she says there is strong scientific evidence that “dogs can digest grains much better than previously thought”, she received the “cold shoulder” from manufacturers and distributors. Now, though, she has been able to get her brand up and running and is in advanced talks with two major wholesalers. 

Some of her first orders came from “employees of pet-food companies” who were eager to see what they had been missing out on. J Sainsbury estimates that at least a quarter of the population in the UK are partly vegetarian or vegan, so it is no surprise that pet-food firms are making an effort to appeal to this market. 

Mars Petcare, one of the largest pet-food manufacturers in the world, recently developed Lovebug, an insect-based dry cat-food product. Created from black-soldier-fly larvae, and sold in British UK supermarkets, it is aimed at pet owners who care about sustainability, since it takes up only one-fifth of the land that a comparable amount of beef uses. Mars has also developed several other products that focus on reducing the environmental impact of pets, including a system for composting cat litter.

Medical care on a par with humans

The consequences of humanisation extend beyond more lavish creature comforts. Medical care is another thriving subsector. For instance, Pets at Home is offering a subscription service that entitles members’ pets to regular check-ups for worms and fleas. However, it also includes more advanced treatments, “which, in some cases, are now on a par with parts of human medical care”, says Mike Iddon of Pets at Home.

Pets at Home has branched out into veterinary services, and currently operates 440 veterinary practices, the majority of which are in stores. Under this joint-venture model, vets “retain clinical and operational freedom” while Pets at Home helps to support them by taking care of property, IT and finance. 

This model, used to build practices from scratch rather than acquiring existing ones, allows both sides to take advantage of economies of scale in procurement and advertising, and share learning and knowledge across practices.

CVS Group goes one step further, providing a fully integrated veterinary-care system, according to its CEO Richard Fairman. It owns its own laboratories and specialist hospitals as well as vet clinics, so it can invest in diagnostic equipment, such as cardiac resynchronisation therapy and magnetic resonance tomography scanners for its frontline vets to help them deal with more complicated cases. 

The images produced by this advanced equipment are then sent to one of CVS’s specialists, who makes a diagnosis and formulates a treatment plan. Fairman thinks that there are other benefits to employing vets directly. CVS’s vets are “part of a clinical team that can support them in their day-to day activities”. 

This includes the development of clinical protocols based on best practice, as well as access to a programme of professional development. There is also a strong emphasis on well-being and mentorship at the company. Fairman believes this helps the vets avoid the high levels of depression prevalent in independent practices.

Lightning progress with drugs and treatments

Fairman believes that preventative care can play a key role in helping pet owners ensure that their pet has a long and healthy life, which is why CVS offers a Healthy Pet Club with regular consultations and advice from the vet. 

Still, no matter how good they are, vets are ultimately dependent on the tools and drugs that they have available. The good news is that the drugs and treatments now on offer are “much more advanced than... only a decade ago”. They can provide hope even for conditions “previously considered inoperable”, such as cancer. Pet owners and vets are also increasingly willing “to pursue last-ditch options”. The upshot is that pets are now far more likely to recover from serious illnesses. 

All this has created “strong and sustainable momentum” for companies that develop the drugs and diagnostic treatments used by vets around the world, says Jamie Brannan, president of international operations at Zoetis, the animal-health giant. 

Brannan notes that while Zoetis used to derive approximately two-thirds of its revenue from livestock and farm animals, the increased amount of money now spent on pets means that in 2020 around 54% of its sales came from its companion-animal segment. What’s more, pet owners should expect more options in the near future as Zoetis has been able to keep “major [research and development] programmes and regulatory reviews on track”, even during the pandemic.

Brannan also points out that Zoetis has enjoyed recent successes in a wide range of areas, from “arthritis pain and inflammation” to “skin allergies, parasitic disease and bacterial infection”. The treatment of osteoarthritis is particularly promising, especially since the increasing lifespan of dogs and cats makes these conditions much more common. 

Zoetis recently received regulatory approval for Librela and Solensia, two injectable monoclonal antibody therapies that help treat osteoarthritis pain in dogs and cats. In addition to its range of traditional drugs, Zoetis is also developing better diagnostic technologies. 

This includes Vetscan Imagyst, a diagnostic platform that uses “a combination of image-recognition technology, algorithms and cloud-based artificial intelligence to deliver rapid testing results to veterinary clinics”. Vetscan has already made its debut in several major markets, including Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK and the US. 

The stocks to buy now

Daniel Miller of the Gabelli Pet Parents Fund is particularly bullish about the American company PetIQ (Nasdaq: PETIQ), which operates 3,400 vet clinics within large stores such as Walmart. This makes the process much more convenient, “since, rather than having to wait while your pet is checked, you can drop it off, go shopping and then collect it later”, says Miller. PetIQ also develops and manufacturers its own medicines, pet food and accessories. Despite explosive growth, which has seen its revenue triple since 2017, it still only trades at 18 times 2022 earnings. 

One way to play the boom in British pet ownership is through Pets at Home (LSE: PETS), Britain’s best-known pet retailer. In addition to selling pets and pet accessories (including food), it operates 440 vet practices in a joint venture with the vets. 

Over the past five years revenue has grown by 44%, or nearly 8% a year, with a solid return on capital expenditure (an important gauge of profitability) of just under 10%. This more than justifies the fact that it trades on a 2022 price/earnings (p/e) ratio of 23. 

CVS Group (LSE: CVSG) has also done well from the boom in pet ownership. The company owns a large number of vet practices, employing around 15% of vets who deal with small animals. It also owns laboratories, specialist pet hospitals and even crematoria. 

While CVS is focusing almost exclusively on the UK for now, it has a small presence in the Netherlands and is currently monitoring the situation in France and Germany to see whether recent regulatory changes will make corporate ownership of clinics viable. While the company trades at a relatively high 32 times earnings, its revenue is growing fast, almost doubling between 2016 and 2020.

PetMed Express (Nasdaq: PETS) is an online pharmacy selling a wide range of veterinary prescription medication in the US, from flea and tick medicine to drugs to combat complex conditions, such as heart disease and arthritis. Traditionally, most consumers have bought medicine directly from vets. But more and more have found that it is cheaper to get a prescription and then buy medicine online, a practice that received a huge boost during lockdowns, when many surgeries were closed. With solid recent sales growth of around 5% a year, PetsMed trades on a 2022 p/e of 19 and yields 4.3%.

The amount that the Japanese are spending on their pets, especially cats, is also increasing, which is good news for the Japan Animal Referral Medical Centre (Tokyo: 6039). The company operates several animal hospitals that deal with serious illnesses referred to it by a network of around 3,747 clinics (just under a third of the market), including kidney-disease and cancer cases. It also provides diagnostic and imaging services to vets’ practices. Sales have grown by around 6% a year for the last five years, while profits have been growing by double digits. Despite this, the company trades on a 2022 p/e of 16.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stocks-and-shares/share-tips/603640/how-to-profit-from-pampered-pets-beyond-the
via IFTTT

Japanese stocks offer plenty of promise at the right price

“Welcome to the weirdest of Olympics”, says Scott Stinson in Canada’s National Post. A flare-up in Covid-19 cases prompted the city to bring in strict restrictions, so the games opened in an expensive, gleaming but almost empty stadium – “not exactly what Tokyo first had in mind”.  

“I feel sorry for the organisers,” says Liam Halligan in The Daily Telegraph. “They are trying to stage the biggest sporting event on earth… under astonishingly difficult circumstances.” A bar on spectators means the hoped-for boost to the local leisure industry won’t materialise. “The contrast with the 1964 Tokyo Olympics”, which came to symbolise Japan’s “astonishing post-war economic renaissance… is heart-breaking.” 

Decades of disappointment 

The post-war boom ended in the early 1990s. The Nikkei-225 index peaked close to 39,000 in 1989 and has never returned to that level. This week, at around 28,000, it was still 28% short of the 1989 peak. The Topix index, a more accurate measure of the market than the Nikkei, finally regained its 1991 levels in February 2021. 

Japan’s markets have suffered “the longest downward phase in any major stockmarket in living memory”, says Ian Cowie in The Sunday Times. “Even very patient investors cannot be sure of topping the podium”. Still, this is the world’s third-biggest economy and “the first step towards making a profit is often to buy low”. On a price/earnings (p/e) ratio of 17, Japan is much cheaper than America’s rating of 22.  

Japanese shares have underperformed this year, says Rosie Murray-West in The Mail on Sunday. The country “had controlled the spread [of Covid-19] so well that it has been complacently slow to roll out a vaccine programme”. Still, with 37% of the population having received a first jab, it is now getting its act together.

Land of opportunity 

Japan is “packed with opportunities, especially in digitalisation, robotics and electric cars”, says Chern-Yeh Kwok of the Aberdeen Japan Investment Trust. The online economy is less mature than elsewhere, says Murray-West, leaving more scope for future growth: “We may think of Japan as a land of bullet trains and robotic convenience, but it is also a country that continues to be reliant on fax machines and where only 8% of purchases are made online”. Prime minister Yoshihide Suga is trying hard to change that.  

For all the doom-mongering, the Nikkei has actually grown at a compound 9.8% annually over the last decade in sterling terms, says Simon Edelsten in the Financial Times. That is behind America but better than the FTSE, Europe and even emerging markets. Japan’s economic performance has been mixed, but the stockmarket is “dominated by multinational companies”, much of whose income is earned abroad. Japan offers investors access to the Asian growth story combined with the comforts of investing in a developed market. Investors may want to take a look at the JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income (LSE: JSGI) and the Baillie Gifford Japan (LSE: BGFD) investment trusts.  

Japanese corporate governance enters the modern age

Japan’s shareholder “revolution” still hangs in the balance, says Mike Bird in The Wall Street Journal. In 2014, then-prime minister Shinzo Abe initiated a push to bring corporate governance into the modern age. He put pressure on businesses to appoint more outside directors onto boards and to focus on delivering value to shareholders. Risk-averse Japanese managers had long preferred to hoard cash rather than invest it or pay it out to shareholders as dividends.  

The war is still being waged across Japanese boardrooms, says Bird. On one side, activist foreign investors; on the other, old-school managers who don’t like being told what to do. Take a recent quarrel at Yakult, the probiotic drink maker. Activist investors see an established brand with a golden opportunity to capitalise on the global wellness trend and expand overseas. Yet the firm’s board is stuffed with company insiders and “has gone from having two non-Japanese members… to having none”.  

Conglomerate Toshiba was revealed this year to have “colluded with the Japanese government to suppress activist investors”, say Leo Lewis and Kana Inagaki in the Financial Times. Investors also complain that reforms designed to clamp down on cross-shareholdings – another tactic to limit shareholder influence – have been watered down. 

The tide is turning in favour of the activists, says Carleton English in Barron’s. Shareholders forced Toshiba’s CEO to resign in April. Those wins are encouraging other campaigns: data from Lazard shows that Japan played host to 26% of non-US activist campaigns in the first half of 2021, up from just 6% in 2015. “Challenges at Japanese companies were once unthinkable”; now the country is becoming a “hotbed” for shareholder activism.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stockmarkets/japan-stockmarkets/603636/japanese-stocks-offer-plenty-of-promise-at-the
via IFTTT

Beware: the government could cut tax relief on pension contributions

Will chancellor Rishi Sunak take the axe to tax relief on private pension savings? Successive chancellors have been rumoured to be considering such changes, only to desist. But there is growing concern in the pensions industry that Sunak might see the need to repair the public finances following Covid-19 as providing the cover he needs to act.

Pension-tax relief is certainly a tempting target. It cost the Treasury £21.2bn in the 2019-2020 financial year, the last for which data is available. And it is a relief that is more valuable to the wealthy: since savers get the relief at their highest marginal rate of income tax, higher-rate taxpayers get twice as much support when making the same pension contribution as basic-rate taxpayers.

Total abolition looks out of the question for any government, let alone one that professes to be an ally of savers taking personal responsibility for their financial futures. But there is a reasonably straightforward reform that would enable the chancellor to reduce the cost of pension-tax relief while simultaneously arguing that he is redistributing resources towards middle-income voters and the less well-off.

An extra 5%

The idea would be to introduce a flat rate of relief that everyone receives, irrespective of what income-tax rate they pay. Analysis suggests that a flat rate set at 25% would save the Treasury around £6bn a year. 

And while netting that very useful windfall, the chancellor would be able to point out that anyone on the basic rate of tax would be receiving an extra 5% of relief on their savings.

The big losers in such a scenario are savers who pay higher-rate or additional-rate income tax. At present, making £10,000 of pension contributions over the course of a year costs these savers only £6,000 and £5,500 respectively. With a 25% flat rate of relief, they would have to find £7,500 to reach the same level of total savings. Those not in a position to make up the shortfall would have to settle for lower pensions later in life.

Members of defined-benefit pension schemes might also run into problems. Their retirement benefits are guaranteed, but in calculating the cost of providing that promise, employers bank on tax reliefs at their current levels. With less relief on offer to some members, that might prompt further reviews of what is affordable.

Still, do not be surprised if the chancellor puts the objections of these groups aside. The Treasury has had an eye on higher-rate pensions relief for many years, but lacked the nerve to make a grab for it. Covid-19 might prove to be the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to pounce.

In that case, wealthier savers may want to consider increasing pension contributions sooner rather than later. Some pension experts believe new tax-relief rates would have to be phased in over time; others point out that the announcement of reform would spark a “buy-now-while stocks-last” rush to make contributions while higher-rate relief is available. The chancellor may choose to pre-empt that possibility by making changes straight away.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/personal-finance/pensions/603629/beware-the-government-could-cut-tax-relief-on-pension
via IFTTT

Private equity swoops on UK companies

“Buyout firms have struck 13 so-called public-to-private deals in Britain so far this year for a total value of almost $31bn,” says Ben Dummett in The Wall Street Journal. That’s more than double the number for the whole of last year and the best performance over the same period since 2007. 

Private-equity funds invest in private companies or buy out publicly listed ones. The bidding war for Wm Morrison Supermarkets has only been the most “high-profile” example of the trend. Healthcare, property and defence businesses are also being snapped up. 

Why the boom? Private-equity firms have “mounds of low-cost debt to make acquisitions” thanks to low interest rates. But takeovers usually require the buyer to pay a premium, which is difficult to justify in the pricey US market.  

Britain, by contrast, is cheap. Data from broker Peel Hunt shows that on a forward 12-month price/earnings basis Britain is “40% cheaper than the US market and 25% cheaper than the eurozone”, says cmcmarkets.com. “S&P 500 firms typically trade at 23 times earnings, compared with just 14 times in London.” 

Britain’s quiet IPO boom 

The private-equity bidding war is good for share prices. But it has also caused concern about the long-term health of the London market. If private firms delist some of Britain’s best businesses, then what will remain for ordinary investors?  

Not to worry, says Simon Foy in The Daily Telegraph. As quickly as firms are going private, plenty of new ones are coming onto the market. “Since the beginning of the year, 54 companies, with a combined market value of £53bn, have floated on the London Stock Exchange”. 

There is a widespread impression that the London bourse is “struggling”. That’s thanks to Deliveroo’s “high-profile flop” – shares in the food-delivery app plunged 26% after listing in March. But as Simon French of Panmure Gordon notes, “if you took an equal stake in each of the companies that have floated this year, your investment would be up by about a third in the year to date”, beating the wider FTSE All-Share’s gain of 7.8%.  

Investors are often warned against having a “home bias”, says David Brenchley in The Times. Almost half of British investors told a Quilter survey that “more than 50% of their investments were in the UK…One in 12 people with more than £60,000 invested admitted to having all of their investments in UK stocks”. Investors who failed to diversify globally have paid the price over the past decade as US markets soared while the FTSE stagnated, but that trend will reverse at some point. Remember that “for a long time before the financial crisis, UK stocks beat American ones”. It’s never a good idea to put all your eggs in one basket, but a touch of home bias looks a sound strategy for now.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stockmarkets/uk-stockmarkets/603637/private-equity-swoops-on-uk-companies
via IFTTT

“Superforecasting”: can you profit from predicting the future?

Back at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, just before the first lockdown in March of 2020, government ministers were organising their planning around what was predicted by their “reasonable worst-case scenario”. The thinking, says the prime minister’s former adviser Dominic Cummings, was that although this set the boundary in terms of foreseeable doomsday scenarios, there was no need to panic because “of course it’s not going to happen”.

The trouble was, even as ministers were saying this, the virus had already spread throughout the country. In his testimony to a joint parliamentary committee, Cummings tells the story of how a “reasonable worst-case” forecast went in a matter of days from “don’t worry it won’t happen” to “well, maybe a 20% chance of happening” to “central planning assumption” to the “terrible” realisation that what was happening in the real world was already worse than that laid out in the doomsday case.

A clue to what Cummings believes is a better approach came just over an hour into his testimony when he said, “A guy called Phil Tetlock wrote a book and in that book he said that you should not use words like reasonable and probable and likely, because it confuses everybody”. 

Enter the “superforecasters”

That book is Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction (2015) by Philip Tetlock, a professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, and Dan Gardner, a journalist. Cummings was referring to their point that, if the argument is that there is a “fair chance” of something happening, some people might take that to mean it’s pretty likely; others that it might happen, but probably not. “Fair chance” was in fact the assessment given of the likelihood of success in the Bay of Pigs invasion that was handed to President John F. Kennedy in 1961. The man who wrote the words “fair chance” later said he had in mind odds of three to one against success. Kennedy, not unreasonably, took it to be a more positive assessment. The attempt to topple Fidel Castro in fact turned out to be a complete disaster.

The same people were advising the president about a year and a half later during the Cuban missile crisis, as Tetlock and Gardner explain. Yet the result this time, despite their working under extreme pressure and the threat of nuclear war, was a “creatively engineered positive result”: a negotiated peace. What had changed?

Following the Bay of Pigs disaster, Kennedy ordered an inquiry to figure out what had gone wrong. “Cosy unanimity”, or “groupthink”, was identified as the main problem, and changes were recommended to the decision-making process. Deference to authority was out, scepticism in. Participants were given a licence to question everything. Fresh perspectives and criticism were not only allowed, but actively sought. Kennedy would leave the room while discussions were under way so that his authority would not prevent people speaking freely. That meant more stress, endless discussions and constant disagreements for those in authority. It also meant the rest of us were spared nuclear annihilation.

Tetlock’s book could be seen as an updating of the one that first described all of this, Irving Janis’s 1972 Victims of Groupthink. Tetlock’s work is informed by insights garnered from modern behavioural psychology and economics, and the results of his own experiments over two decades running “superforecasting” tournaments, in which individuals and teams are asked to make predictions about specific events, and the results quantified and ranked. The results of these experiments have been surprising: they show that it is possible to learn how to predict the future, at least in the near term; that people who learn how to do it get better at it over time; and indeed, not only do they get better at it, they outperform experts whose job it is to provide forecasts for governments and business. 

How do the “superforecasters” manage such a feat? The key, in a nutshell, is to treat beliefs as hypotheses to be tested, not treasures to be guarded, says Tetlock. In other words, don’t be satisfied with the first answer that springs to mind. Think carefully about what would have to happen for your belief to be true, and try to quantify the likelihood of the various possibilities by assigning probabilities. Balance your own “inside” view with the “outside” view – that is, what would normally be expected to happen in these kinds of situations? Make sure your forecast is specific, measurable and unambiguous. Break seemingly intractable problems into manageable sub-problems. Remain curious and humble in the face of uncertainty; open-minded about the possibility that you are wrong. If proven wrong, don’t see it as a failure, but an opportunity to learn and do better next time. Actively seek out contrary opinions and sources of information and seek to synthesise them with your own; constantly update your view as new information rolls in.

Master all this – and yes, it is as much hard work as it sounds – and you too can expect to outperform traditional intelligence agencies and economic analysts, and predict just how likely it is that another country will leave the EU in 2023 or that inflation will rise above 3.5% before the year’s out. 

Great, so which stock is the next Amazon?

This sounds like exciting news for investors. If it’s possible to learn how to predict the future and to get better at it with practice, then this would pretty obviously seem to be a skill you could profit from. Well, if you are a short-term trader, perhaps – Tetlock is cautiously optimistic about the possibility. But he also raises some of the more obvious objections.

The first is that markets already embody the “wisdom of crowds”, one of the sources of better information that it is the aim of superforecasting to tap. Markets are a mechanism for collecting widely dispersed information and distilling it into a single judgement: the price. Even if markets are in reality far less efficient than proponents of the “efficient markets hypothesis” suppose, it remains very hard consistently to beat the market. It is at present unknown but doubtful whether superforecasters could really do better than, say, active fund managers. And active fund managers, as regular readers of MoneyWeek will know, rarely outperform passive market trackers after costs.  

Another problem, as MoneyWeek’s John Stepek points out in The Sceptical Investor (2019), is that having figured out what you think is going to happen, you are still left as an investor with difficult questions – and the odds of you getting them right consistently are low. Imagine that your superforecasting skills had led, against all the punditry and received wisdom, to expect a victory for Donald Trump in the 2016 US presidential election.

Having glimpsed this in your crystal ball, what then should you have bought to profit from the vision? Short stocks and buy gold, perhaps? The news of Trump’s victory did indeed see stocks swoon and gold soar. Yet stocks soon rebounded to their original level, then continued to higher ones. Gold finished the year much where it had started. “So even if you had correctly bet against the political consensus,” says Stepek, “you may well have struggled to make any money out of it.” (If you had had the foresight to sell the Mexican peso against the dollar, you’d have done better – but predicting the future direction of currencies, as with the oil price, is a very dangerous business for the unwary.)  

What’s going on here?

The strongest objection to the whole idea of forecasting the future, though, is that it’s all bosh. This is roughly the view put forward by John Kay and Mervyn King in Radical Uncertainty: Decision-making for an Unknowable Future (2020). Their argument can be summed up by taking another trip to the White House, this time around the spring of 2011, when President Barack Obama was meeting with his senior advisers and trying to decide whether the person of interest holed up in a secretive compound in Abbottabad was Osama bin Laden.

Following Tetlockian reasoning – as a result of lessons learned from previous intelligence failures over Iraq – Obama’s team offered their various assessments of the probability that the man there was the one they were looking for. The CIA leader was 95% certain it was. Others were less sure, putting the odds at 40% or even 30%. The president summed up the discussion by saying, “This is 50-50. Look guys, this is a flip of the coin. I can’t base this decision on the notion that we have any greater certainty than that”. 

In his book, Tetlock examines the possibility that Obama was wrong to say that – that the average of the views in the room put the odds significantly higher than 50%, meaning he had good reason for making the decision he did. But Kay and King, when discussing the same story, are more plausible when they insist that Obama did not mean what he said literally. He was not saying that the probability that the person in that room was Osama bin Laden was 50%. He was saying that he simply didn’t know, but had to make a decision anyway. And that’s actually the correct answer. 

The kinds of questions that superforecasters excel at answering are necessarily highly specific and short-term, and are “at best a proxy for what we really want to know”, as Kay put it in review of Tetlock’s book in the Financial Times. To return to a question posed above, it may be useful to know whether inflation will be 3.5% by the end of the year. But it is at best a proxy for what we really want to know, which is, as Kay and King put in their book, “What is going on here?” Are Britain and other developed nations pursuing policies that risk putting inflation on an uncontrollable and dangerous upward path? If so, what could and should be done about it? What can I do to protect myself?

Such questions demand narrative forms of reasoning to provide speculative answers, and humans act according to such stories. “I don’t know” is a better starting point, and indeed end point, than “64% probability” when the numbers do not refer to known frequency distributions and hence really do not mean anything at all. The world is not a game of chance and the powerful tools of probability are not useful in every situation.

Where does all this leave investors? Roughly where we came in. Tetlock’s book might give you some useful tools for thinking about thinking. But the kind of questions investors ask – is this company a game-changer and will it generate outsize profits? Given my saving and investment goals, what is a sensible investment strategy? – will remain as difficult to answer as ever. A lot of hard thinking and a good story might help you. A crystal ball will not.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/investment-strategy/603635/how-to-be-a-superforecaster-profit-from-predicting-the-future
via IFTTT

Marlboro Man stubs it out as Philip Morris CEO says “ban cigarettes”

In a move that would see his company’s main product outlawed, the CEO of Philip Morris International (PMI) has called on the UK government “to ban cigarettes within a decade”, says Zoe Wood in the Guardian. According to Jacek Olczak, cigarettes “should be treated like petrol cars, the sale of which is due to be banned from 2030”. Such a move would end the “confusion” felt by smokers, some of whom still think the alternatives to cigarettes are even more deadly than the traditional product. 

Even if a ban isn’t brought in, PMI has promised to stop selling conventional cigarettes in the UK within a decade, says Jonathan Eley in the Financial Times. While this may sound radical, it is a reflection of how the industry is coming under pressure from consumers, investors and government policy. A combination of high taxes, increasingly stringent regulations such as plain packaging, and changing social mores have ensured that smoking rates in the UK “are already comparatively low”. Around 14% of the population smoke and the government has pledged to reduce the figure to 5% by 2030.

Smoke and mirrors?

The declining rate of smoking and looming regulation is clearly “a problem” for the entire cigarette industry, but PMI is hardly “folding up shop”, says Al Root in Barron’s. The move only applies to Britain, which is “only one market”. PMI’s biggest market is the EU, which account for just under 40% of its sales, while Asian markets also remain strong. PMI is also focusing on the “smoke-free” market: 25% of its sales already stem from products such as IQOS, an e-cigarette-like product that heats tobacco rather than burning it, which is supposed to be less harmful than traditional cigarettes. It is slightly different from vaping, whereby the device heats a flavoured liquid that contains nicotine.

The idea that IQOS and other alternative products are going to compensate for lost sales of conventional cigarettes may be overly optimistic, says Alex Ralph in The Times. Although IQOS generates sales of $6.8bn a year for PMI, there are signs that it is “struggling to gain traction in the UK”. The group has decided to close its IQOS stores, “having spent millions on a failed retail strategy”. While PMI argues that online and supermarket sales mean that it no longer needs the shops, “it’s still a big U-turn to close your retail footprint in the UK after just 18 months of operation”.

Whatever happens, most of PMI’s competitors are betting that cigarettes and related products will be around for years, says Oliver Gill for The Sunday Telegraph. Having got rid of its related businesses, Big Tobacco has largely returned to its roots, “with an arsenal of vaping, heated tobacco and nicotine-pouch products”. This may not be a bad bet, given that “the number of global smokers – roughly one billion – has remained static for some time”. The sector also continues to make “big profits” with “eye-watering margins”.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stockmarkets/603642/marlboro-man-stubs-it-out-as-philip-morris-ceo-says-ban-cigarettes
via IFTTT

Tesla is starting to motor as profits roll in

Tesla is roaring ahead, says Lex in the Financial Times. Sales reached almost $12bn in the second quarter, nearly double the level of a year ago, while operating profits tripled to $1.3bn. Tesla “benefited from higher sales volumes and reined in its operating costs”. Tesla also seems optimistic about the future, as it has already announced “robust” deliveries of new vehicles for the second quarter, despite supply-chain problems.

The latest figures suggest that Tesla “has finally joined the grown-ups”, says Antony Currie on Breakingviews. Its pre-tax profit margin of 11% rivals Toyota and General Motors (GM). Still, this doesn’t mean the shares are worth buying. They look wildly overvalued at 115 times forward earnings. Meanwhile, the group is facing growing competition from both “established manufacturers”, such as Volkswagen, Ford Motor and GM, and “young start-ups” such as Lucid. Tesla may have avoided the fate of other electric carmakers, such as Faraday Future, Fisker Automotive and Lordstown Motors, which either went bankrupt or failed to break through, but even CEO Elon Musk accepts that Tesla’s future may not be as rosy as its past, says Io Dodds in The Daily Telegraph. 

He warned against complacency, cautioning that “the seeds of defeat are sown on the day of victory”. In particular, he admitted that Tesla was vulnerable to further supply-chain pressures, while Tesla continues to experience “repeated turbulence” in China due to a series of protests by consumers about “alleged safety errors”.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stockmarkets/603643/tesla-is-starting-to-motor-as-profits-roll-in
via IFTTT

A dark cloud over Chinese stocks

Shares in Chinese companies have plunged amid growing regulatory pressure. The Nasdaq Golden Dragon China index, which tracks Chinese firms listed in America, fell by 15% on Monday and Tuesday, the biggest two-day plunge since 2008. China’s benchmark CSI 300 index fell by 6.5% over the same period. Tech firms slumped, with Tencent’s shares in Hong Kong down by nearly 16% over Monday and Tuesday. The latest falls followed news of a ban on for-profit school tutoring, a big industry in Asia.  

The sell-off underscores just “how fragile investors’ confidence has become after a months-long regulatory onslaught”, say Jeanny Yu and Livia Yap on Bloomberg. Beijing is intent on reining in “private enterprises it blames for exacerbating inequality” and “increasing financial risk”. The realisation that regulators are willing to impose “short-term pain” on markets while pursuing “longer-term socialist goals has been a rude awakening for investors”.  

As of 5 May, there were 248 Chinese companies with listings in the US. Companies such as Alibaba and Pinduoduo have listings in America in order to access Western capital markets. There is now a “dark cloud hanging over” these stocks, writes Therese Poletti for MarketWatch. The next one in the firing line? The Chinese authorities have made their displeasure clear with ride-hailing app Didi, which recently listed in New York.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stockmarkets/china-stockmarkets/603638/a-dark-cloud-over-chinese-stocks
via IFTTT

Share tips of the week – 30 July

Three to buy

Tripadvisor 

Barron’s 

Online travel-reviews website Tripadvisor “has struggled to make the most of its hundreds of millions of users”, but a new travel-subscription service for $99 a year offering discounted hotels and other benefits “could rekindle interest”. The “fragmented market” of online bookings “is crying out for a strong aggregator”; enter Tripadvisor Plus. If it attracts ten million subscribers, that would generate $1bn in revenue and $500m of free cash flow –  and propel the stock above $100. $36.26 

Medica Group 

The Sunday Times 

The backlog of patients waiting for elective procedures is “likely to boost demand for Medica Group’s services”. The firm offers teleradiology to hospitals that outsource around 20% of their cases. It expanded last November with the €16m acquisition of Global Diagnostics Ireland, and it has also formed a partnership with Australia’s Integral Diagnostics. Sales for this year are expected to jump to £61.4m, up from £36.8m last year. “There is a good chance Medica will be in demand in the months ahead,” especially over the summer as NHS radiologists take a holiday. 175p

Gateley

Investors’ Chronicle 

Revenue is bouncing back at law firm Gateley, thanks chiefly to its property and corporate divisions. They have been buoyed by the stamp-duty holiday and rumours of a capital-gains tax hike, which has encouraged mergers and acquisitions. Profit before tax was up by 7.1% to £19.3m in the year to 30 April. The government is set to keep promoting housebuilding and banking work will increase this year too. 210p 

Three to sell

Sumo Digital

The Mail on Sunday 

Video-game developer Sumo Digital counts giants such as Microsoft and Apple as customers. It builds, tests, and designs games and recently began publishing its own titles, a “higher-risk but higher-reward” undertaking. Chinese internet giant Tencent “clearly believes” in Sumo; it has offered to buy it for £900m. A higher offer appears unlikely to materialise. Shareholders have benefited from Sumo’s growth, but cautious investors should sell now in case the deal turns sour. 495p 

Rio Tinto 

The Daily Telegraph 

Rio Tinto’s strong performance in 2020 was overshadowed by the firm’s destruction of two ancient rock shelters in Australia. The firm has apologised and scrapped plans to mine at “culturally sensitive” sites. But despite pre-tax profits of $15.4bn last year thanks to the rising price of iron ore, it remains risky. The share price ultimately depends on “how many roads, airports and bridges” countries, particularly China, whose demand is driving up iron-ore prices, choose to build. Tying investments to politicians’ decisions in another country “is a gamble pure and simple”. Avoid. 5, 926p

Focusrite 

Shares Magazine 

Focusrite “continues to mark record share-price highs”. The music and audio-products firm has raised revenue and profit expectations for the year to the end of August. Musicians have been forced to record at home during the pandemic, while podcasting is “booming”. But the global shortage of semi-conductors is making it difficult to meet rising levels of demand. This year’s earnings look set to decline as restrictions are eased. Take profits. 1,416p

...and the rest

The Mail on Sunday 

Frontier Developments is a leader in the multibillion pound video-gaming industry. It has millions of loyal fans behind it. A recent trading statement “caused consternation” due to “teething problems” with one of its new games. This share-price dip is a buying opportunity (2,500p)

Barron’s 

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts’ “tilt toward no-frills... brands” is working. Those “tiers of lodging” have recovered faster than more upscale ones. Meanwhile, Hilton Worldwide Holdings’ fortunes are tied to group and business travel, but the firm’s “asset-light” operating model – it relies on franchising and management fees instead of owning hotels – “provides some flexibility” and protection. At $69.80 and $125.26 respectively, both stocks are buys. 

The Daily Telegraph 

Doric Nimrod Air Three owns four Airbus A380s and leases them to Emirates, the airline. They have remained grounded throughout the pandemic, but dividends have continued to flow as Emirates is contractually obliged to make lease repayments. Hold (41p)

Investors’ Chronicle 

Recruiter SThree is benefiting from the rising number of job vacancies as firms seek to hire employees for permanent positions. Finances “are sound” and net cash sits at £47.5m, “marginally below” the level recorded at the end of the financial year in November. The shares aren’t too expensive, “but we remain on the sidelines”. Hold (462p). Vimto producer Nichols is a “well-run business” –  witness its ability to maintain a net cash position throughout a “uniquely challenging period”. But rising supply-chain costs could prove a problem. Hold for now (1,450p).



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stocks-and-shares/share-tips/603628/share-tips-of-the-week-30-july
via IFTTT

XAUUSD – Preparing to make a new high before month end?

XAUUSD, H4

Gold prices rose yesterday, continuing a full-day test of the month high in the 1,834 zone after the Fed kept interest rates and QE measures in place, boosting gold prices from a view of a weakening US Dollar amid inflation concerns. The dollar was under pressure again during the US market after the important US economic data releases turned out worse than market expectations, with the second-quarter annual GDP reading coming in at 6.5%, above the 6.3% seen in the previous quarter, but below the 8.5% expected. Weekly unemployment benefits were higher than expected at 400k.

In addition to the support of this week’s major news and events, in H4 gold broke out of the triangle seen after the Fed’s announcement and moved above the key resistance zone consisting of trendlines MA50 and MA200, as well as the psychological 1,800, resulting in purchasing power.

The rise in gold prices shows an attempt to break through the month’s high zone. In the smaller timeframes like H1, the price is forming a continuation bullish flag pattern where, if the price breaks through the original high of 1,834 and above, the next target is 1,845, while the support for today is at 1,815.

The outbreak of the delta coronavirus variant remains a risk factor that may cause concern to traders and investors before the weekend. This was noted by the decline in Asian stock markets this morning, with the Hang Seng and Nikkei225 falling more than -1%, as well as the US 10-year Treasury yield slipping -1.5% , all of which may support gold prices to make new highs before the end of July.

However, on the economic calendar today there are still important data from the US side, including the PCE Price Index, Personal Income & Spending, Chicago PMI, and revised UoM Consumer Confidence.

Click here to access our Economic Calendar

Chayut Vachirathanakit
Market Analyst – HF Educational Office – Thailand

Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.



from HF Analysis /258107/
via IFTTT

Don’t count resources out

Commodities have performed poorly over the past year, but they tend to move in long and volatile cycles. from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://m...