Friday, April 2, 2021

Events to Look Out for Next Week

  • ISM Services PMI (USD, GMT 14:00) – The ISM-NMI index should rise to 57.5 from 55.3 in February, versus a 17-month high of 58.1 in July, an 11-year low of 41.8 in April, a 13-year high of 61.2 in September of 2018, and an all-time low of 37.8 in November of 2008. Producer sentiment has remained firm into 2021 as businesses scramble to rebuild inventories, with an added lift into March from expanding vaccine availability and two rounds of stimulus distributions in January and March.

Tuesday – 06 April 2021


  • RBA Rate Statement & Interest Rate (AUD, GMT 04:30) – After unexpectedly extending its QE program following its February board meeting. Governor Lowe warned, however, that the expected recovery is likely to “remain bumpy and uneven” and “remains dependent on the health situation and on significant fiscal and monetary support”. The central scenario is for the Australian economy to expand 3 1/2% this year and “return to its end-2019 level by the middle of this year”. In the meantime the Fed, ECB and RBA in pushing back against market bets that accommodation will need to be trimmed soon. 

Wednesday – 07 April 2021


  • Markit PMI Composite (EUR, GMT 07:55-08:00) – Final composite PMI readings for Germany and the Eurozone for March already look outdated considering that PMI readings confirmed that the jump in the ZEW earlier in  March was not just a reflection of buoyant investor confidence, but actually a reflected improvement at the company level in Germany. At the same time, the PMI in particular flagged supply chain shortages and a marked rise in costs and subsequently prices charged. However, considering the latest virus developments that brought fresh lockdowns the composite PMI readings for the Eurozone remain under contraction.
  • Ivey PMI (CAD, GMT 14:00) – A survey of purchasing managers, the Index provides an overview of the state of business conditions in the country. Canada’s July Ivey PMI is expected to improve further as the latest data are supportive of the ultra-accommodative central bank story.
  • FOMC Minutes (USD, GMT 18:00) – The report should reiterate that the Fed’s aim is to anchor inflation expectations around 2%, and the new posture makes policy much less pre-emptive about future inflation — as Kaplan stated “we are more willing to be aggressive and less preemptive.” On fiscal policy, they probably repeat that infrastructure spending is an investment “worth making.”

Thursday – 08 April 2021


  • ECB Monetary Policy Meeting Accounts (EUR, GMT 11:30) – The ECB Monetary Policy Meeting Accounts provide information with regards to the policymakers’ rationale behind their decisions. The ECB is expected to remain dovish, with the latest comments from officials clearly highlighting the commitment to the extended monthly purchase volume and signal that ECB may back calls for the program to become part of the ECB’s regular toolkit.
  • Jobless Claims (USD, GMT 23:30) – The US initial jobless claims rose 61k to 719k in the week ended March 27. That follows the -107k plunge to 658k (was 684k) in the March 20 week which was the lowest since the pandemic shut the economy a year ago. The report was on the disappointing side relative to the huge improvement in the labor market revealed in Friday’s jobs report.
  • Fed Chair Powell speech (USD, GMT 16:00)

Friday – 09 April 2021


  • Consumer Price Index (CNY, GMT 01:30) – Chinese inflation is expected to remain unchanged in March at 0.6% m/m from 1.0% last month, but the headline to decline to  -0.4% y/y.
  • Producer  Price Index (CNY, GMT 01:30) – Chinese PPI is expected to grow in March at 1.5% m/m falling from 1.7% last month.
  • Producer  Price Index (USD, GMT 12:30) – We expect a 0.5% March PPI headline rise with a 0.2% core price gain, following respective gains of 0.5% and 0.2% in February and a huge 1.3% and 1.2% in January. As expected readings would result in a rise for the y/y headline PPI metric to 3.9% from 2.8% in February.

Click here to access the HotForex Economic Calendar

Andria Pichidi

Market Analyst

Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.



from HF Analysis /226044/
via IFTTT

NFP – Biggest monthly jobs gain since August 2020

US March nonfarm payrolls report was a blowout! Payrolls climbed 916,000 after the 468,000 (was 379,000) jump in February and the 233,000 (was 166,000) increase in January for net 156,000 in upward revisions. It is the biggest jump since August’s 1.583 million. The unemployment rate fell to 6.0% from 6.2%.

The labour force surged 347,000 following the 50,000 rebound in February. Household employment was up a hefty 609,000 after gaining 208,000 previously. Average hourly earnings dipped -0.1% but following an upwardly revised 0.3% (was 0.2%) jump. The workweek advanced to 34.9 hours from 34.6. The labor force participation rate edged up to 61.5% from 61.4%.

Total private payrolls were up 780,000 versus 558,000 (was 465,000) previously (and compares to the 517,000 ADP gain). The service sector added 597,000 versus February’s 602,000 (was 513,000) pop. The goods sector added 183,000 with construction contributing 110,000. Leisure and hospitality payrolls rose 280,000, and there was a 136,000 rise in government jobs.

Click here to access our Economic Calendar

Andria Pichidi

Market Analyst

Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.



from HF Analysis /226000/
via IFTTT

Has the USD Approached a Turning Point?

There could be a feeling that USD corrective rally has run out of steam. The index bounced off 93.50 level on Thursday as details of Biden spending plan prompted upward corporate earnings revisions, which in turn fueled advance of risk assets, oil made controversial rebound on the OPEC decision and Treasury yields retreated. However, in my view, the main USD uptrend still remains valid:Let’s look at the arguments.The key argument here is the struggling euro. It has the largest weight in the Dollar index. Europe have some serious issues with the vaccination program, and is forced to resort to a rough method of fight - lockdowns. Social restrictions stifle economic activity and cause grievous harm to the economy. It’s hard to imagine that situation will change in the near-term and the idea of that US economy will continue to outperform EU economy in terms of recovery pace will remain dominant in the EURUSD.The second argument is, of course, the growing difference in the level of fiscal stimulus. In the EU, the EU recovery plan is stuck in the German constitutional court, and in the US, the Biden plan is likely to be passed through Congress with minimal changes. Fiscal stimulus will certainly boost corporate performance of companies, in particular, expected revenues, as well as reduce uncertainty, so there is reason to believe that the rotation from European ETFs to American ones will intensify. This will also affect EURUSD.The Fed's position relative to the far end of the yield curve is the third argument for the continued growth of the dollar. The Fed has made it clear that it will not interfere with long-term rates from rising. This week, the 10-year Treasury yields renewed their local maximum high, climbing to the highest level since January 2020:Given the latter, there is no reason for a trend reversal. For the dollar, this is definitely a signal for growth, because, firstly, the attractiveness of Treasuries increases, and secondly, the carry trade becomes more expensive as USD funding becomes more expensive.The ISM US Manufacturing Index rose from 60.8 to 64.7 in March. The new orders component jumped to 68 points, which suggests that US expansion is not only gaining momentum, but will also perform well next month.Next week, we can see the dollar index move to 94.00, and EURUSD to 1.16, especially if today the NFP meets expectations, and the Treasury yields start to rise again next week (most likely scenario).As for the economic calendar, next week will be stingy with events due to the holidays. The Fed meeting minutes and the ECB's PEPP asset purchases will be the main sources of valuable information for the market.Disclaimer: The material provided is for information purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice. The views, information, or opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the author, and not to the author’s employer, organization, committee or other group or individual or company.High Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75% and 65% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with Tickmill UK Ltd and Tickmill Europe Ltd respectively. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/has-the-usd-approached-a-turning-point"
via IFTTT

Becalmed FX Markets ahead of NFP

EURUSD, H1

With most of Europe closed for the Easter holiday weekend, forex markets remain becalmed in rather tight ranges ahead of the non-farm payroll data later today at 12:30 GMT. 650,000 new jobs is consensus for the headline with unemployment down to 6.0% from 6.2%, big rises for the hospitality & construction sectors expected, along with a rise in women returning to the work force as the vaccine rollout continues to gain traction.

In FX markets, the USDIndex is currently down at four-day lows around 92.86, today’s pivot point is at 93.02 with s1 and R1 at 92.75 and 93.18 respectively. The EUR holds onto four-day highs at 1.1778, JPY trades round s1 at 110.50, whilst Cable holds over the 1.3800 pivot point at 1.3838, with R1 at 1.3862.  The USDCAD has rallied from S1 at 1.2527 to test today’s pivot point at 1.2562, with the AUD and NZD holding north of 0.7600 and 0.7000 respectively. The USDCHF holds over 0.9400 for a fourth day, but down from yesterday’s high at 9465 to 0.9405.

The largest mover of the major crosses today (at 10:30 GMT) is the CADJPY which is down 0.24% from opening trades which touched R1 at 88.28 to lows under S1 at 87.85. The pair is currently testing back to 88.00. The daily pivot point sits at 88.06, with the H4 20-period moving average at 88.12. The daily pivot point sits at 88.06, with the H1 20-period moving average at 88.12.  In the higher time frame the pair remains well bid in a “consolidating-at-highs” trend ; from a break of the 20-day moving average at the end of January at 81.80, to the current resistance at 88.00.

Click here to access the HotForex Economic Calendar

Stuart Cowell

Head Market Analyst

Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.



from HF Analysis /225950/
via IFTTT

Share tips of the week

Three to buy

Kingfisher

(Mail on Sunday) B&Q and Screwfix-owner Kingfisher had an “extraordinary” 2020. The DIY group has benefited from “our desire to make the same four walls look nicer”. But the firm owes its success to more than the lockdown boom: CEO Thierry Garnier’s five-year plan has focused on improving performance in France, a key market, cutting some costs and investing in its digital presence. Turnover for the year to 31 January 2021 was up by 7.2% to £12.3bn and pre-tax profits grew from £103m in 2019 to £756m in 2020. The firm’s cash pile is “reassuring on the dividend front”, and its long- term strategy “seems to be paying off”. 325p 

Ford

(Shares) Ford’s investments in electric and autonomous vehicles are yielding positive results. As activity recovers after the pandemic the car maker “should see increased sales for its cars and pickup trucks”. The group is suffering from the impact of the global semiconductor shortage, which could see earnings drop by $1bn to $2.5bn. But with a “clearer electric-vehicle strategy” the firm looks well prepared for the future. $12.85

Kenmare

(Investors’ Chronicle) Mozambique-based miner Kenmare Resources had a difficult year, but the firm has nonetheless managed to maintain its dividend. Production for the year was down by 15%, but higher ilmenite (a mineral-rich sand) prices “helped the bottom line”. Debt has risen sharply but the firm’s relocation of its WCP B plant was also the final step in a “multi-year growth programme” that should yield positive results. 407p

Three to sell

Genel Energy 

(Investors’ Chronicle) Kurdistan-based oil company Genel Energy saw its sales more than halve in 2020. Cashflow slumped to $4m from $99m in 2019. Production is set to stay flat at around 32,000 barrels of oil per day. The firm has previously struggled to get paid by the Kurdistan Regional Government and is still owed around $159m of oil sales, “equal to its entire 2020 revenue”. Profits were further harmed by a $320m impairment. All this adds up to a sell. 187p 

Manchester & London

(The Daily Telegraph) The Telegraph tipped Manchester & London in 2017 when it switched from “largely British shares to a growth-focused fund” containing big tech stocks such as Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet. It has performed strongly over the last three years. But now a “basket of stocks” that should have returned 32% over 2020 only yielded an 8.4% gain. This is because the trust sold call options on the shares it holds, limiting overall returns. This approach has complicated “what should be a straightforward investment rationale”. The argument for the trust “no longer holds”. 586p 

In The Style 

(The Sunday Times) Online fashion retailer In The Style listed on Aim this month. It made a £2m profit on sales of £35.4m in the nine months to January 2021. FounderAdam Frisby ascribes last year’s growth to the firm’s “switch from selling dresses to lockdown-friendly jogging bottoms”. But it remains to be seen whether recent growth will “outlive the pandemic... Investors should wait for evidence [that it] isn’t just a passing fad.” Avoid. 235p

...and the rest

Investors’ Chronicle 

“Pent up demand” by homeowners spending their savings on improvements helped offset the lockdown-induced downturn at LED-lighting manufacturer Luceco. It looks “well positioned” for the recovery. Buy (266p). Speciality chemicals and personal care business Elementis “posted a predictably downbeat set of results after a pandemic-ravaged year”. Sales in its core divisions, personal care and coatings, fell by 9% and 7% respectively. The group also needs to reduce debt. “We remain cautious for now.” Sell (121p)

Shares 

Data services group Relx has seen its shares fall behind “since the market shifted its focus to cheap value stocks”. But the share-price weakness represents an opportunity. Relx’s focus on organic growth, coupled with an “excellent track record”, make it a good investment for the long term. Buy (1,757p)

The Daily Telegraph 

Record-low interest rates hit banks even before the virus. Lockdowns threatening customers’ solvency “make matters worse”. Sell Italy’s Intesa Sanpaolo (€2.30)

The Motley Fool 

Hydrogen fuel cells “are increasingly being made obsolete by lithium-ion batteries”, which doesn’t bode well for green-energy hydrogen companies such as Plug Power. The company has also said it will have to restate accounts for previous years. Avoid ($35). Revenue at Nokia declined by 6% last year and is set to fall again this year. Consumers are ditching Nokia’s traditional 4G network for 5G, “to which the company has yet to fully upgrade”. Avoid (€3.50).



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stocks-and-shares/share-tips/603020/share-tips-of-the-week
via IFTTT

Private equity funds: get strong returns from these bargain investment trusts

You normally get what you pay for when buying investment trusts. Well-managed funds with a good record generally trade at a premium to net asset value (NAV), while a large discount usually reflects a poor record and doubtful quality. However, there are exceptions. These include several trusts in the private-equity sector, where discounts of around 20% are not unusual and can represent a compelling investment.

Private equity in general is “an incredibly attractive asset class, with $6trn of assets globally that consistently outperform public markets”, says Oliver Gardey, manager of the ICG Enterprise Trust (LSE: ICGT) – itself currently on an 18% discount to NAV. However, the dispersion of performance between managers is high so “accessing the best private-equity managers is critical”. Unfortunately, “top-tier managers are very popular, so you need to be part of the club (which means being well-connected) and able to make a minimum commitment of £5m for each investment,” he says. “It takes £50m-£100m for a well-diversified portfolio and a long-term commitment, as funds take four to five years to invest, and then four to five years to harvest.”

This would put private-equity investment well outside the reach of nearly all individual investors – which is where the listed trusts come in. These democratise private-equity investment, since they are accessible to investors of any size and have the added benefit of not having to lock capital away for many years. The stockmarket listing means that investors can buy or sell at any time, without regard to the liquidity of the underlying portfolio that the trust holds.

The trade-off for this liquidity – as with all investment trusts – is that the shares can trade at a premium or discount to NAV, and that the size of this can grow or shrink over time. Analysing discounts requires more work with private equity than with other trusts that invest in liquid assets, because the NAV will not reflect the current value of the portfolio. Instead, it will be based on past valuations and so will be understated when assets are performing well. They should also be using conservative assumptions, with the result that disposals of investments by private-equity trusts are usually done at a significant premium to book value.

A focus on growth businesses 

Much of the case for private equity is that companies are taking longer to float on the stockmarket – partly because they have less need for capital than the asset-intensive companies of old, partly because the supply of private capital has increased and can deliver whatever they require, and partly because of the reporting and regulatory constraints of listing. 

The number of “unicorns” – private companies such as Airbnb and Bytedance (owners of TikTok) that are valued at over $1bn – has multiplied more than tenfold in less than ten years. Waiting until these businesses go public before investing could mean missing out on huge profits, so a growing number of investment trusts now invest in private, as well as listed, equities. RIT Capital Partners and Caledonia Investments have done so for decades: Caledonia shareholders have had to be patient for results in recent years, but the NAV of RIT has recently been boosted by 8.4% through the flotation of Coupang, an e-commerce business in South Korea.

Trusts managed by Baillie Gifford – most notably Scottish Mortgage Trust – adopted the strategy more recently. Two years ago, the firm went further and launched a new trust, Schiehallion (LSE: MNTN), dedicated to private equity, following in the footsteps of Chrysalis (LSE: CHRY) a few months earlier. Both trusts, which seek to be passive investors in growth companies prior to their listing, have been hugely successful. CHRY’s shares have doubled since listing and MNTN’s returned 80%. Both have raised additional equity and are seeking to raise more, and both trade on significant premiums to NAV.

This makes returns in the rest of the private-equity sector seem rather pedestrian. These trusts pursue a more traditional model of investment based on buying control of companies. Historic out-performance, according to Gardey, is driven by “long-term ownership, turning good companies into better companies through active engagement and ensuring greater financial and investment discipline. Long-term value creation is put ahead of short-term profits and the interests of company management are aligned with those of the private-equity managers, who are only rewarded on disposal.”

Some trusts struggled in the 2008 crisis but lessons were learned, trusts are conservatively financed and the last ten years have been good for investors. The investment focus now tends to be on attractive growth businesses in sectors such as technology, media, healthcare and business services. With Better Capital, Jon Moulton tried the opposite strategy of buying cheaply companies that were on the rocks and trying to turn them around, but this was not a success. 

Top performers and big discounts

A few listed trusts give investors direct access to investments managed by a single private-equity manager, such as those run by 3i (LSE: III) or HgCapital (LSE: HGT). However, most private-equity managers do not have their own listed funds. Access to these is via trusts which are “funds of funds”, meaning the trust invests in a portfolio of private-equity funds. Examples include ICGT and Pantheon International (LSE: PIN). This imposes an additional layer of costs on shareholders, although the managers can often reduce costs through obtaining discounts on fees, direct investing and co-investment in businesses alongside the funds they invest in. 

At the top of the performance table is HgCapital, focusing on technology-related businesses, whose share price has trebled in the last five years. Its shares trade at a 4% premium to NAV but its consistent record of positive surprises on valuations (reflecting strong underlying performance) and disposals mean that the NAV is almost certainly understated. 3i, the £10bn sector giant, trades on a larger premium of 22% despite the share price rising “only” 70% in five years. However, it yields over 3%, twice as much as HGT, and the NAV attaches no value to 3i’s business managing funds for other investors. 

The sector’s most improved performer is Apax Global Alpha (LSE: APAX), listed six years ago, which has Apax’s current and former partners as major shareholders. It sought to combine private equity with yield by investing half its assets in Apax-managed funds and half in “derived investments”. The latter are shorter-term investments in equity and debt derived from knowledge gained and ideas generated from the private-equity funds. These provide income, hence Apax offers a yield of 5.3%, but their performance has been disappointing compared to the private-equity portfolio.

The difference in relative performance means that the private-equity portfolio now accounts for nearly two-thirds of the total and the “derived” portfolio for barely a quarter, so overall performance is improving. The investment return in the last year was 19%, but the return to shareholders was 34% since the discount shrank. Last week’s sudden widening in the discount to 11% provides an excellent buying opportunity, given that the NAV is likely to be understated.

Fund-of-funds PIN trades on a near 15% discount despite having cleaned up an unwieldy share structure a couple of years ago and exited a long tail of small holdings in the portfolio. Investment performance over all periods, including back to inception in 1987, is a remarkably consistent 12% per year. Given that most of the portfolio was last valued at the end of September, there is sure to be more to come. Despite the absence of a dividend, the shares are cheap.

Intermediate Capital took over management of ICGT five years ago, giving the fund access to a broader range of private-equity contacts and expertise and enabling nearly half the portfolio to be internally managed. This part of the portfolio has returned 19% per year over five years while the third party funds have returned 14%, promising continued improvement as the internally managed portfolio grows. This progress should bring down the discount from a heady 18%, as it did for Apax.

NB Private Equity (LSE: NBPE) managed a 12-month return of 21% but still trades on a discount of 25% to estimated NAV, reckons analyst Chris Brown at JPM Cazenove, making it “excellent value”. He estimates the discount for Harbourvest (LSE: HVPE) to be 19%, which looks anomalous given its excellent record (a return of 100% over five years) and high exposure to the tech sector (29%). The record of Princess Private Equity (LSE: PEY) is even better, 106% over five years, but Brown rates it as only a “hold” as its discount of 16% is “fair relative to peers”. In absolute terms, it still looks attractive.

Perhaps the biggest bargain is Oakley Capital (LSE: OCI), which is trading on a 26% discount after an 18% return in 2020 and 114% over five years. Performance is held back by the 31% of the portfolio in cash, but this is matched more than twice over by commitments to invest in Oakley funds. The portfolio looks modestly valued given its focus on the popular technology and education sectors. The third leg of its investment strategy, consumer brands, provides recovery prospects once the coronavirus crisis passes – notably via Time Out, the well-known publisher of entertainment and nightlife guides, which has been expanding into food centres and events in cities around the world.

“I am very positive about the outlook for private equity and believe that it will continue to out-perform public equities,” says Gardey. “Long-term ownership has provided superior governance and there have been fewer disasters in the last ten years.” This confidence is reflected across the sector, which makes the cheapness of most of the listed trusts an anomaly. Perhaps, as one cynic says, “the brokers are too busy earning fees from issuing equity in anything renewable to pay any attention to listed private equity”.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/funds/investment-trusts/603008/private-equity-funds-get-strong-returns-from-these
via IFTTT

The great global semiconductor squeeze

Delays in the Suez Canal will do nothing to ease the global “supply-chain crisis”, says George Stahl in The Wall Street Journal. The semiconductor industry is looking particularly stressed. Computer-chip shortages have been driven by the demand side of the market, says Mark Sweney in The Guardian. 

Lockdowns have brought soaring sales of games consoles, televisions and home computers. Meanwhile, modern cars need more chips than ever before (40% of the manufacturing cost of a new car goes on electronics). 

“Nearly every” big carmaker has been forced to cut back on production or even temporarily close plants for want of chips, says Stahl. Toyota says that it is not just semiconductors that are in short supply: it has also been hit by a dearth of plastics after freak weather hit the Texan petrochemical industry in February. Carmakers will pay a steep price for underestimating vehicle demand, says Bloomberg. Globally they could lose a combined $61bn in sales this year. 

The semiconductor market is cyclical and had been on a downswing before the pandemic triggered a sudden spike in demand. Politicians in Washington, Brussels and Beijing are concerned about the security of semiconductor supply, which is dominated by companies from Taiwan and South Korea. Industry behemoth Apple was forced to delay last year’s launch of the iPhone 12 while it scrambled to source enough chips, says Sweney. 

And Samsung, itself the world’s second-biggest semiconductor maker, is struggling to find enough of the widgets for its own smartphones. The shortages have triggered a price spike but new supplies won’t arrive soon: “It can take up to two years to get complex semiconductor production factories up and running.”



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stocks-and-shares/tech-stocks/603019/the-great-global-semiconductor-squeeze
via IFTTT

Three stocks to buy to forge a path to our green future

The world is undergoing rapid change amid the degradation of the natural environment and the looming breakdown of the global climate system. There is therefore a worldwide pan-industrial effort to use resources with much greater efficiency. To exploit this secular theme, we identify companies that either deliver or benefit from the efficient use of resources. We have strict criteria covering both quality and value. 

We like to own firms with enduring assets that generate predictable long-term cash flows. They must benefit from high barriers to entry (so it is difficult for potential rivals to gain a foothold in the market) and trade at a reasonable valuation. This approach has served us well: the Menhaden investment trust’s net asset value (NAV) has risen by an annual 11% in the past five years.

Helping technology go green

Google’s parent company Alphabet, (Nasdaq: GOOGL) is helping the entire technology industry transition to a more sustainable footing. The company is one of the largest corporate buyers of renewable-power worldwide and aims to run only on carbon-free energy by 2030. The firm occupies a dominant position in search engines and has the ability to monetise an unparalleled level of user interaction, which should underpin revenue growth for many years. Furthermore, there should be significant potential to expand margins as YouTube, Cloud and other business lines mature and investments in start-ups mature. 

Sophisticated internet infrastructure

Telecoms and media group Charter Communications (Nasdaq: CHTR), a key broadband provider to over 20 million households, is set to play an important role in enabling significant improvements in resource and energy-efficiency with the development of the internet of things (IoT). Its hybrid fibre-coax network (comprising a mix of fibre-optic cables and coaxial cables, the type used to deliver cable television), is critical for infrastructure. Traditional telecom providers still partly rely on copper telephone wires, while high upfront costs serve to limit fibre build-outs by incumbents and new entrants. 

Charter offers a superior bundled connectivity product (including mobile) at a lower price than competitors. We believe it can continue to deliver robust growth in free cash flow per share based upon a combination of revenue growth, falling capital intensity, share buybacks and lower customer turnover. 

On track for industry-leading profits

Canadian Pacific Railway (Toronto: CP) owns infrastructure that can’t be replicated. Prohibitive start-up costs and building regulations ensure that no one is building railways today. Economies of scale mean that transporting freight by rail is up to four times more fuel-efficient than by road, which helps provide rail operators with a significant cost advantage over their main competitor, trucks, on longer-haul routes. 

We believe these scale benefits will persist even as we shift to electric and autonomous vehicles because rail should be able to harness the same technologies. The proposed merger with Kansas City Southern will create a unique footprint linking Canada, the US and Mexico. The ensuing opportunities should help the company deliver industry-leading earnings growth in the years ahead.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stocks-and-shares/share-tips/603009/three-stocks-to-buy-to-forge-a-path-to-our-green
via IFTTT

The downfall of Archegos

Late last week, stockmarkets were rattled as the share prices of a handful of big-name tech and communications stocks – including Chinese tech giant Baidu and US media group ViacomCBS – plunged, as huge blocks of their shares were sold into the market. It turned out that a family office called Archegos Capital Management, run by former hedge-fund manager Bill Hwang, had run into trouble in the wake of a “margin call” (see below) from its lenders, triggering the sale of more than $20bn-worth of shares. So what happened, and is it anything that you need to worry about? 

Archegos’s problems appear to have been triggered by ViacomCBS specifically. Between the start of the year and 22 March, shares in the media conglomerate almost tripled in value. Viacom decided to take advantage by issuing new shares. The share price fell, partly because existing shareholders would be diluted, but also because it had already seen such extraordinary gains, and no doubt some investors were looking for excuses to take profits. The decline appears to have triggered the margin call, and the resulting share sale exacerbated the decline. 

Investment banks Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse and Nomura all provided “prime brokerage services” (the lending of cash and securities) to the fund. However, it looks as though the latter two have borne the brunt of the liquidation, by being later to sell than the former two. Both Credit Suisse and Nomura saw double-digit share-price falls early this week as they warned of potentially hefty first-quarter losses. 

This is all very well, but what does it mean for you? Previous big fund blow-ups include LTCM in 1998 (which was much more systemically important and was bailed out as a result), and Amaranth in 2006 (which lost billions betting on natural gas but had little wider market impact). So far it looks as though Archegos is more like the latter. It’s embarrassing for the banks involved to have enabled such extraordinary levels of leverage – as Robin Wigglesworth puts it in the Financial Times, Hwang’s strategy looks “like a Reddit day trader got access to a Goldman Sachs credit card and went bananas” – but so far losses are contained.

But wary investors might note that past blow-ups have occurred closer to market tops than bottoms. One reason Hwang could borrow and bet so heavily is that investors are fear missing out on gains more than losing money. But when that mood turns, profits can evaporate fast. The biggest risk, says Wigglesworth, may be that “a debacle of this magnitude encourages the entire investment banking industry to scale back how much leverage they offer”. The main consolation is that would most likely hit the most expensive parts of the market hardest.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/investment-strategy/603025/the-downfall-of-archegos
via IFTTT

The new Suez crisis will boost inflation

The grounding of the Ever Given container ship halted traffic on the Suez Canal for almost a week before the vessel was finally freed on Monday. 

The blockage resulted in vast maritime tailbacks as hundreds of container ships waited to pass between the Mediterranean and the Red Sea, disrupting an estimated £7bn of trade in goods every day, according to shipping data from Lloyd’s List. Shipping line Maersk warned that knock-on congestion at ports could potentially take “months” to clear. 

A crucial chokepoint 

The Suez Canal carries about 12% of world trade. It reduces shipping times between Europe and Asia by almost two weeks (boats would otherwise have to go around the whole of Africa). An estimated 7% of the world’s oil passes through the canal, but oil markets remained calm during the blockage. Renewed virus restrictions in Europe and plentiful global oil stockpiles meant that shortages remained far from traders’ minds. 

The Suez Canal is one of four major “chokepoints” for global shipping, says Deutsche Welle. The Strait of Hormuz, which separates Iran from the Arabian Peninsula, occupies a special place in the nightmares of oil traders: about a quarter of seaborne oil and one-third of liquefied natural gas pass through the narrow strait. The Panama Canal carries 5% of world trade; in Asia, 40% of global trade and 80% of Chinese oil imports pass through the Strait of Malacca . “At its narrowest point off Singapore” it is 1.7 miles wide. 

Prices will rise 

Global shipping was already “in chaos” before the Suez blockage, says Hanna Ziady for CNN Business. Covid-19 disruption, which has closed factories and tightened border controls, has put global supply chains under “unprecedented” stress. On the demand side, US seaborne imports are up by 30% in a year because of booming demand for “televisions, furniture and exercise bikes”. 

The result is that container-shipping rates have soared, says the Financial Times. The cost of shipping a 40-ft container from east Asia to the US has risen from $1,500 in January 2020 to $4,000 today. Supply chains have held up during the pandemic; prolonged shortages have been rare. Yet the “New Suez crisis” is a reminder that our “just-in-time” logistics model prioritises efficiency over “resilience”. 

Pricier shipping costs will eventually be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, says James Thomson in the Australian Financial Review. Ports from Los Angeles to Auckland to Chittagong in Bangladesh are already badly congested. A surge in demand for goods from locked-down consumers has manufacturers working flat out to keep up: the PMI gauge of eurozone manufacturing activity recorded its highest reading since 1977 in March. “It’s hard to see how this pressure doesn’t manifest [itself] in higher inflation.” 



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/economy/global-economy/603018/the-new-suez-crisis-will-boost-inflation
via IFTTT

Investors get a reality check in China as stockmarkets fall

China's benchmark CSI 300 stockmarket index soared by 27% in 2020 thanks to the Covid-19-induced stimulus, but the rally peaked in February this year and the index has since tumbled by 13%. It has lost 4% since 1 January. 

The main cause is tighter money, as Jacky Wong explains in The Wall Street Journal. The People’s Bank of China, the central bank, turned on the monetary taps last year in response to the virus. Yet with the recovery looking secure, it started to remove some of that liquidity from the financial system at the start of this year. “The spectre of bubbles past still haunt Chinese policy makers”: previous post-crisis stimulus efforts have saddled the financial system with a worrying debt burden. Regulators’ priority is curbing of speculation in property, but tighter credit brings “collateral damage” to stocks. 

Big tech gets smaller 

Chinese markets have also been affected by the ongoing global “rotation” away from highly-priced growth stocks (particularly technology companies) towards more cyclical sectors.  

Shares in tech giants such as Alibaba, Baidu and JD.com were “hammered” last week after US regulators pressed forward with changes that could ultimately see the firms removed from US stock exchanges, reports Arjun Kharpal for CNBC. Many Chinese tech firms have dual listings in America in order to access a wider pool of investor capital. 

Big Chinese tech firms are also under pressure in their home market from tighter regulation. Beijing appears to have concluded that the sector needs to be cut down to size to ensure social stability, says Eoin Treacy on Fuller Treacy Money. “Companies like Tencent and Alibaba” now face clear “limits” on how much further they can expand. 

The market pullback hasn’t undermined an ongoing boom in initial public offerings (IPOs), notes Hudson Lockett in the Financial Times. The value of flotations in Hong Kong has hit $16.4bn so far this year, compared with just $1.8bn in the first three months of last year. Yet Chinese stocks are not the value play they once were. The CSI 300’s price/earnings ratio has risen from 12 to 19 over the past year. 

Tighter money in China underlines a growing split between rich economies, where central banks plan to keep credit easy, and emerging markets, where central bankers are growing hawkish; Russia and Brazil both recently raised interest rates. China was “first in, first out” of the pandemic, Peiqian Liu of Natwest Markets told Sofia Horta e Costa and Richard Frost on Bloomberg. 

Now, this “stockmarket rout” could provide another leading indicator for the rest of the world: “When central banks and governments start exiting pandemic-era stimulus” the results for investors are “not pretty”.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stockmarkets/china-stockmarkets/603016/investors-get-a-reality-check-in-china-as
via IFTTT

What I learned from 15 years of investing in small companies

In early March, Spirax-Sarco Engineering’s results for 2020 caused the share price to rise by 380p. What made this catch my eye was not the size of the jump – less than 3.5% from £110 – but that 380p was far more than I remember paying for shares in the group, which makes steam-management systems and pumps, for the small-cap trust I started running in the late 1980s. Since then, the shares have multiplied 50-fold, excluding dividends.

This made me dig out old reports to see what else had survived and prospered. Maybe there would be some lessons to be learned from my 15 years of managing UK small-cap funds, a job I embarked upon in the late 1980s. My style had been based on “reassuringly expensive” long-term growth companies with a sprinkling of high-risk turnaround stories. Some investments, such as Spirax-Sarco, were held throughout and I would still be holding them today if the trust and I had stayed put. Others always had a sell-by date on them.

Many of the holdings were subsequently taken over, some after exceptional performances, some having fizzled out. Some I gave up on (usually wisely) and some were duds. But what stands out are the long-term winners that have survived. These by themselves would have ensured a reasonable long-term performance if held until today. It supports Baillie Gifford’s research showing that just a few companies account for all the long-term performance of the US stockmarket. 

With the exception of Aveva, up 80-fold in 25 years, these companies were not in the technology and biotech sectors. Some of the stocks in those industries performed spectacularly in the short term, many were taken over, but no others have survived. I was always wary of small mining and energy companies, believing that their global ambitions were unrealistic. Those I invested in did fine but were all taken over. Financials were another sector to be wary of: few firms can sustain a competitive advantage for long. Wealth-manager Rathbones has done well, though its stock has dropped by 40% from its 2017 high. 

A simple but brilliant idea

The share price of Shaftesbury is down by more than a third from its 2018 peak but has still multiplied tenfold since the Levy family started to invest in central London “villages.” Their thesis, simple but brilliant, was never to invest in anything more than a 15-minute walk from their offices so that they could keep a close eye on buildings, tenants and opportunities. By focusing investment on tightly-knit areas they could turn them into destinations, press for local improvements in streets and footfall, and lift the value of the villages. Housebuilder Berkeley, which initially sold upmarket built-to-order houses before moving into urban regeneration, had a comparable policy of adding value through landscaping and lifting the desirability of locations; its shares have multiplied 100-fold since 1990.

Several of the long term winners are, like Spirax-Sarco, in the industrials sector, including Rotork, Renishaw and Weir. Investing in these at a time when British industry was in relentless decline was counter-intuitive, but innovation and the application of the latest technology were key to their success. 

I bought Rotork in 1990 after a daytrip hosted by Severn Trent Water. This included a visit to an unmanned and fully automated water-treatment site reliant on Rotork’s valve actuators to control the process. It was also clear that rebuilding Kuwait’s oil infrastructure would be a bonanza for the likes of Rotork. The shares have since multiplied more than 100-fold. Weir’s shares have risen 30-fold since the late 1980s, though they are 30% below their 2014 peak. Oxford Instruments was a perennial disappointment but its shares have still risen tenfold in 12 years.

Renishaw, up 50-fold, has also been volatile largely because of its vertically-integrated business model. The business was based on the invention of a probe for ultra-accurate measurement and developed into various applications of the technology. Against conventional wisdom, Renishaw didn’t believe in subcontracting any manufacturing; they maintained that only by going through the whole process themselves, including designing and producing the machine tools, could they learn how to do it better and gain new ideas. 

People-businesses can rarely sustain a competitive advantage for long. Rathbones, founded in 1742, was clearly worth the benefit of the doubt and so was Savills, founded in 1855. Estate-agency is a cyclical market but international expansion has made it less so and the shares have multiplied 20-fold.

Spirits go upmarket

Simple, obvious good ideas have always been worth backing even if management has had to learn on the job. Dechra Pharmaceuticals, specialising in veterinary products but with ambitions to develop its pet-pharmaceutical arm, was floated in late 2000 at 120p and quickly rose to nearly £2. The shares then fell by 75% in the next two years but now trade at nearly 30 times the flotation price. A more recent example is Fever-tree, bought by the private-equity arm of Lloyds Bank in 2013. The press was outraged that a bank bailed out by the government was spending £25m on a firm with profits of just £1m.

I asked a friend who worked in Lloyds’ private-equity business. He explained that the spirits market was fragmenting and going upmarket. People would not want to consume high-quality spirits with bog-standard mixers, providing an opportunity for a new brand. The business was floated in 2014 and is now valued at nearly £3bn.

Another happy hunting ground was “roll-out” companies. Find a retailer or restaurateur that has identified a good concept in a few locations and has the potential to roll the idea out nationally. Fashions don’t last for long, economies of scale don’t always apply and once chains reach maturity, they tend to decline. So it’s important to sell out in time. Next, launched by George Davies in 1981, is the exception that proves the rule.

The business model of Cityvision, a chain of video-rental stores, relied on recycling old stock into new stores, so it required an exit when expansion peaked. The first restaurant of the Pelican group, a brasserie in St Martin’s Lane, London, had been set up by a former colleague (previously a civil servant). Her family sold out to new management who rolled out the concept as Café Rouge and multiplied my money sevenfold. A month after I sold out, they accepted a bid from a major brewery, recognising, as I had, that it was time to exit.

French Connection was tipped to me by a friend in the fashion trade at a parents’ evening. Within a week, I had visited Stephen Marks at his office in Chelsea and bought the shares. He had recently adopted the FCUK brand, inspired by the logo that French Connection’s in-house football team had chosen for their strip. The shares soared but this was never going to be another Next. Superdry and Ted Baker have since burned out in similar fashion although Boohoo prospers – for now.

Don’t bet the farm on recovery stories

Solid and steady survivors such as Marshalls  (landscaping products), Travis Perkins (builders’ merchants) and Greene King (pubs) have been good long-term investments but tripped up and became recovery stocks along the way. 

Games Workshop has risen 20-fold in five years but had been a recovery stock three times previously. The lure of recovery is the prospect of multiplying your money in a share everyone else hates but it’s not an area to bet the farm on.

I was charmed into Bluebird Toys by its CEO, Torquil Norman (father-in-law of venture capitalist Kate Bingham) who had been a popular client in my short spell in corporate finance. The success of “Polly Pocket” caused the shares, previously on the rocks, to multiply. The version aimed at boys, “Mighty Max”, was named after me after  a humorous exchange at the Earl’s Court toy fair. I cashed in soon after. 

My most spectacular success was the most reckless. I bought two million shares in Cannon Street Investments at 2p, down more than 99% from their peak in late 1992 on the sole basis that Tom Long, whom I knew of as the former CEO of Souza Cruz (a subsidiary of British American Tobacco) had become chairman. The shares multiplied tenfold in a year or two as a messy, over-borrowed conglomerate was streamlined through disposals. I then sold.

Regrets: I’ve had a few

My biggest regrets are not the duds I bought but the great companies I missed. Channel Express floated in the mid-1980s as an air-freight business. Its boss, Philip Meeson, had been a Red Arrows pilot and then began importing 2CV cars from France and selling them from a lot on the King’s Road, London. The site was converted into a BMW dealership and later sold. Though Meeson was clearly a serial-entrepreneur, I didn’t see a long-term investment thesis. The company is now called Jet2 and the shares have multiplied more than 100-fold.

Another regret was Asos. In early 2004, we identified this online retailer, whose idea was to replicate cheaply and quickly clothes worn by celebrities, hence the name “As Seen on Screen”. We recommended the shares to our clients in the monthly newsletter at 25p... and suggested taking profits after they had doubled in six months. The shares then multiplied 100-fold in ten years but have had a yo-yo ride since. I hope some clients didn’t sell.

What are the lessons? The best long-term investments are not the get-rich-quickly companies but those offering long-term compound growth. Holding them requires nerve and patience as the shares are often volatile and can stagnate for long periods. It is tempting to give up and sell. If an investment is not suitable for the long-term, it’s best to be clear about that at the start as it makes selling easier. 

Buying for recovery can also be hugely profitable but these are rarely “forever” investments. Finally, great investments are not found through diligent research and endless company presentations but through casual recommendations, chance encounters and inspiration, not perspiration. As John le Carré wrote: “A desk is a dangerous place from which to view the world.”



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/funds/603011/what-i-learned-from-15-years-of-investing-in-small-companies
via IFTTT

The best ways to invest in private equity

Private equity is now firmly part of the investment mainstream, thanks to a record of strong returns. Over the last ten years, European buyout funds have achieved an annual return (as measured by internal rate of return, or IRR) of 15%, according to the European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association. By comparison, the FTSE 250 index – a proxy for the type of mid-sized companies that these funds often invest in – has managed a total return of just 8.8%. 

However, these headline figures disguise a lot of variation. Globally, the top quartile of buyout funds returned over 20% while the bottom quartile barely made a positive return, according to private-equity giant Bain Capital. This shows the need to be selective and the challenge of picking winners. That’s also true of managed funds that invest in listed assets, but there are significant differences between how traditional funds work and how private equity works. Investors should make sure they understand how these returns are achieved, whether they can be sustained and what could be the best way to profit from the boom. 

A large, long-term commitment

Private equity (PE) is fundamentally an asset class for large financial institutions – the fact that individual investors can get involved through listed funds is a sideshow. The minimum commitment to each PE fund can be millions or even tens of millions of pounds, so the amount of capital that must be allocated to construct a diversified portfolio of funds is substantial. With demand from institutions now strong and the amounts being committed very large – $300bn (£215bn) for buyout funds last year – this is an excellent business for successful managers. They can raise a fund every four to five years, with an average size of close to $2bn (this is skewed by the ability of the top managers to raise giant buyout funds of around $20bn). The manager’s brand has become a key factor in deciding where to invest for many institutions, especially since the outcome of an investment takes a few years to materialise, which helps established managers gain and retain market share. 

The multi-year time frames of private equity are highly beneficial to the managers. Once the investors – who are known as limited partners (LPs) – have committed to invest a certain amount, the private-equity fund manager – or general partner (GP) – will call the capital in stages over the investment period to fund the acquisition of companies. This phase will usually last five years. Investments will usually be held for three to seven years, after which the manager will exit by selling the firm to another private-equity fund or a trade buyer (another company in the same industry), or listing it on the stock exchange through an initial public offering (IPO). The fund may be able to make some distributions to the LPs relatively soon if the investments are performing adequately, but it takes a few years to get one’s initial capital back and up to 12 to 15 years to realise all the returns. 

Meanwhile, PE managers can generally charge 1.5% management fee on committed capital (even though it is not invested yet) and take a performance fee (known as carried interest) – typically 20% – if the fund achieves returns above a certain rate (an internal rate of return, or IRR, of 8% is common). The manager may be able to use bridge financing (short-term loans taken out with the intention of replacing them with longer-term funding) to postpone the call of capital or to accelerate distributions, both of which help juice the IRR by altering the timing of cash flows. (For this reason, you should not look solely at IRR as a measure of the manager’s returns, but also look at the multiple – what it paid for the company and what it’s now worth.)

The secret of their success

When a PE manager sets out to raise a new pool of capital, the detailed documentation (known as the private placement memorandum) will underline how they will deliver returns by finding undervalued firms and adding operational value to them by cutting costs, outsourcing production, investing in brand growth and internationalising operations. However, the true skill of PE managers is financial engineering. They take advantage of low interest rates to gear up their investments (and often to fund small acquisitions or “add-ons” at lower valuation multiples that grow the size of the businesses quickly). Higher leverage improves tax efficiency because interest costs are tax deductible, it imposes financial discipline on the firm’s management and magnifies returns if all goes well. It also supports high prices: the ratio of enterprise value (equity plus debt) to earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation (EV/Ebitda) on new deals averaged 11.4 in the US and 12.6 in Europe last year (versus a past average of between eight and nine), with over half of deals geared above seven times Ebitda.

Given this environment of abundant liquidity, many GPs content themselves with a game of pass the parcel: one manager who has raised a fund acquires a firm from another who needs to exit, adding additional debt along the way. Two or three years after acquisition, the portfolio firm may be refinanced to pay a dividend to the PE fund, even though this will leave it carrying yet more debt. 

Most of these acquisitions are financed by leveraged loans, or increasingly misnamed “high-yield” bonds (where yields are below 4% in the US and 3.5% in Europe). The bonds are usually rated at B, well below investment grade (BBB), while quality of leveraged loans is also dropping. Nowadays, more than half of leveraged loans are acquired and packaged up by collateralised loan obligation (CLO) managers, who may raise fresh funds every quarter and are under pressure to deploy capital swiftly. Consequently they have little room for negotiation, which results in very poor underwriting standards: 94% of new leveraged loans are now cov-lite (ie, they carry hardly any financial covenants to protect the lenders).

Playing hardball with lenders

Some highly leveraged borrowers will default as a result of the current economic crisis. Rating agencies expect corporate default rates to increase from 4% to 8% in 2021. This will apply to PE-backed firms as well: 10% of US PE-owned firms are reported to be in “intensive care”, fully drawing down their revolving lines of credit and requiring injections of fresh equity. Higher defaults will weigh on future returns for PE funds. 

Still, during the global downturn in 2008, PE-backed firms outperformed others, in part due to the assistance that their owners can provide in a crisis. Buyout funds have $1trn in “dry powder” (the industry term for cash waiting to be invested), which may be used to inject fresh equity. They are also expert at negotiating with lenders, who will know that weak covenants and high leverage mean they are unlikely to recover the historic average of 70 cents on the dollar if the borrowers default. Consequently, lenders may be receptive to amending and extending existing loans, or swapping debt for equity. 

Buy the fund cheap – or buy the manager

Listed PE firms are “evergreen” in nature, meaning they have permanent capital. They reinvest proceeds from the sale of investments into new investments, but at any given point there will be existing “seasoned” investments in the portfolio. This is important because you need to take into account how well these seasoned investments are probably performing, as well as the manager’s record on exited investments, to decide whether a fund’s premium or discount to net asset value (NAV) is attractive. 

NAVs can lag reality in a positive way: a successful investment will be worth more than the book value on the accounts. But when an investment is struggling, NAV will decline more slowly than reality: managers will try to step valuations down gradually to avoid worrying their LPs. Right now, the prospects for certain businesses – such as restaurant chains and other leisure operators – remain unclear, so bear this in mind with trusts that are directly or indirectly invested in them.

Decent trusts now on discounts include Apax Global Alpha (LSE: APAX). The underlying portfolio is robust, but it looks fully valued: 60% of the portfolio firms are valued above 14 times Ebitda. However, when the trust’s own discount is wide enough, that doesn’t matter and it’s back out at 11%. Outside the UK, Wendel (France: MF) trades at 34% discount. Its share price has disappointed since 2018, but it remains a strong manager: it sold security firm Allied Universal last year for a 2.5 times return. Meanwhile, shareholders should pressure funds of funds with large discounts such as HarbourVest (LSE: HVPE) and Pantheon International (LSE: PIN) to sell assets to other PE buyers to close the discount (whether they will is another matter).  

Alternatively, investors should consider buying the managers. 3i (LSE: III) is both an investment portfolio and the management business for other 3i funds. The NAV does not ascribe any value to the manager, so it always trades at a large premium. Eurazeo (France: RF) is similar, but trades at a discount (now 24%) because of its exposure to ailing car-rental firm Europcar. The rest of the portfolio is sound and it raised €2.8bn to manage in its external funds last year.

The founders of management firms such as Apollo, Carlyle and KKR have also sought to raise cash through IPOs in recent years. They mostly earn from fees and carried interest (with few direct investments) and valuations imply the market thinks this is where the real value lies in private equity. Partners Group has a market capitalisation of CHF30bn (£23bn), or a third of its assets under management (AUM), while shares in EQT have risen 300% since it listed in September 2019. Its market cap of SEK261bn (£22bn) is half its AUM, while its EV/Ebitda is a staggering 70 times. That’s too steep, but Apollo Global Management (NYSE: APO), with a market cap of $20bn (including $3bn in investments) against AUM of $450bn looks cheap.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/investment-strategy/603012/the-best-ways-to-invest-in-private-equity
via IFTTT

Why you should buy palladium and sell platinum

Palladium and platinum, two “cousin” metals and both part of the platinum-group metals (PGMs) on the periodic table, are used in catalytic converters and other industrial applications. Palladium is trading around $2,670 an ounce, with platinum on $1,177 an ounce. 

Analysts at Citi think palladium could hit $3,000 by the third quarter of this year, says Jack Denton in Barron’s. A surge in catalytic-converter demand as many countries tighten emissions standards should lead to a sizeable global deficit in the metal this year and next. Russian producer Nornickel says problems at two of its Siberian mines will mean 15% to 20% lower production of PGMs than planned this year. Russia is the world’s largest producer of palladium and the second in platinum after South Africa.  

The two metals are set to trade in opposite directions, says Adam Hoyes for Capital Economics. Platinum is used more intensively in diesel catalytic converters, but demand for diesel vehicles is falling as Europe has shifted towards petrol cars, which use more palladium. While palladium is essentially an industrial metal, platinum is also affected by investment demand, which may be about to fall back on rising US bond yields. Hoyes thinks palladium will hit $2,800/oz by the end of next year, but reckons platinum will fall to $800/oz by then.



from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/commodities/industrial-metals/603017/why-you-should-buy-palladium-and-sell-platinum
via IFTTT

Don’t count resources out

Commodities have performed poorly over the past year, but they tend to move in long and volatile cycles. from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://m...