Tuesday, July 6, 2021
Dollar Falls in Payrolls Wake; Fed Minutes Seen Key
from Forex News https://www.investing.com/news/forex-news/dollar-falls-in-payrolls-wake-fed-minutes-seen-key-2550254
via IFTTT
Daily Market Outlook, July 6, 2021
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/daily-market-outlook-july-6-2021"
via IFTTT
Market Update – July 6 – A weaker USD; RBA, OPEC & Kiwi hog the headlines
Market News Today – The Dollar continued to weaken, strong EZ & UK data lifted European markets, England to lift most restrictions by July 19. OPEC meeting abandoned OIL prices hit 3-year high (Brent $77+) – Overnight RBA – no change but bond purchases were extended for 6 months but at lower rate, “conditions will not be met before 2024.” NZD rallied (1.14%) on strong data and 2021 intertest rate rise expectations, dragging AUD higher (0.98%). Asian equities firmer. USDIndex under 92.00, EUR 1.1890, JPY under 111.00 at 110.75 & Cable tests up to 1.3900 zone. Gold breaches $1800, USOil over $75.00 at $75.75. German manufacturing orders missed significantly (-3.7%) but previous reading was revised sharply higher (+1.2%).
Week Ahead – FOMC Minutes, RBA Rate Decision, ECB Growth Forecasts & Special Strategy Meeting.
European Open – The September 10-year Bund future is slightly lower, as are US futures, while in cash markets the U.S. 10-year rate has lifted 2.0 bp to 1.444%. Dax & FTSE100 FUTs are weaker on stronger GBP 7 EUR with German data weighing.
Today – EZ & UK Construction PMI, German ZEW, US Final Services & Composite PMI, ISM Services PMI, ECB’s de Cos, de Guindos. Day 1 of the ECB Strategy Review meeting.
Biggest FX Mover @ (06:30 GMT) NZDUSD (+1.06%) Rallied from 0.7020 zone yesterday, which was up from Fridays NFP low of 0.6945, to breach 0.7100 on very strong reversal in business confidence today. Faster MAs aligned higher, RSI 82.38 and significantly OB but cooling, MACD signal line and histogram rising remain significantly above 0 line. Stochs. also in OB zone, but also cooling. H1 ATR 0.0015 Daily ATR 0.0065.
Click here to access our Economic Calendar
Stuart Cowell
Head Market Analyst
Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
from HF Analysis /250540/
via IFTTT
Dollar Down, but NZ Dollar Rises as Chance of Earlier Interest Rate Hike Grows
from Forex News https://www.investing.com/news/forex-news/dollar-down-but-nz-dollar-rises-as-chance-of-earlier-interest-rate-hike-grows-2550210
via IFTTT
USDJPY facing bearish pressure, possible further drop
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/usdjpy-facing-bearish-pressure-possible-further-drop"
via IFTTT
Dollar awaits Fed minutes, kiwi aloft on rate expectations
from Forex News https://www.investing.com/news/economy/dollar-awaits-fed-minutes-kiwi-aloft-on-rate-expectations-2550173
via IFTTT
Monday, July 5, 2021
BTCUSD approaching pullback support, potential for bounce
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/btcusd-approaching-pullback-support-potential-for-bounce"
via IFTTT
EURUSD H1 is approaching pivot, potential for bounce
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/eurusd-h1-is-approaching-pivot-potential-for-bounce"
via IFTTT
Dax H4 is below pivot, potential for further drop
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/dax-h4-is-below-pivot-potential-for-further-drop"
via IFTTT
NIKKEI approaching key graphical swing low, possible chance for a bounce
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/nikkei-approaching-key-graphical-swing-low-possible-chance-for-a-bounce"
via IFTTT
If a company is cheap enough for private equity, why isn’t it cheap enough for everyone else?
Why weren’t all UK fund managers invested in Wm Morrison when the recent bid for the supermarket chain came in? If it was cheap enough for private equity firm CDR to want it, why was it not cheap enough for traditional fund managers to be holding?
I wrote about this last week – suggesting fund managers have little grounds for complaint about losing out on the initial price rise or on any further increases should a buyout go ahead at some point. But there is another way to look at it: you could argue that companies are worth more to private equity companies than public shareholders.
There are a couple of reasons for this. One is volatility – publicly listed shares are volatile; private equity holdings, which aren’t priced very often, are not. Another is the one-owner effect – disparate groups of shareholders find it hard to force management to do their bidding; private equity owners (holding 100 % of a company and speaking with one voice) do not.
Then there is financial engineering – private equity is less wary of debt than perhaps it should be. As its managers tend to encourage higher levels of debt, they put a higher value on steady cash flow (required to pay the interest on that debt) than perhaps the public market does.
Private equity managers will also tell you they are not just lucky accountants with easy access to cheap money, but better managers than anyone else. More cynically, you might just say that companies have more value to private equity than traditional managers because they get to charge higher fees for holding them.
Mix all this up and even with some very large pinches of salt, it feels like there is some sense in the idea that a private equity manager should pay more to take a firm private than a traditional manager will pay to keep it public.
Private equity valuations aren’t a secret
I don’t buy all of it of course. I am, for example, buried under missives from fund managers telling me about their active ESG policies at the moment. Believe the PR and you must believe they all spend most waking hours haranguing company managers about various bits of do-goodery – and that they do this with significant success.
But if their voice works so well with this, why doesn’t haranguing companies about their balance sheet structure and business practices work? We will have to leave that as one of the great mysteries of finance – it’s a long list – and accept it as just the way it is. If it were not, no public companies would ever be taken private by private equity.
However, as Pelham Smithers of Pelham Smithers Associates points out, there is another complication here: the criteria on which private equity target companies are valued in the market is not exactly a secret. The “knowledge is distributed around the market”. Everyone knows the current price of a listed company, the price they themselves would pay, and the price a private equity firm could pay.
The challenge then is to figure out if the private equity investor will end up paying that price: it’s about assigning a value to the likelihood of a bid. That means thinking about pricing probabilities.
Back to Morrisons. “The chances of it being bid for are now 100%,” points out Smithers. What was it before? Obviously very much lower. The company had a low-grade Covid experience – profits fell by 50% last year, which meant it didn’t look particularly cheap on conventional valuation measures.
If fund managers figured the probability of a bid was therefore quite low they put a lower value on the shares than they would otherwise – something that, of course, then made it more attractive to private equity. So the managers who weren’t holding Morrisons last week were guilty – guilty of getting their probability calculations wrong.
Fund managers leave value on the table
Nonetheless, the key point is that any fund managers interested in value have a problem. Buying what look like cheap stocks and waiting for them to go up without correctly calculating the odds of the arrival of a catalyst can present what we might call material career risk.
As several readers have pointed out – and I suspect there are ex-fund managers or even frustrated current fund managers among them – to survive you have to deliver performance year in year out.
If you don’t, money will head for the doors – the same exit you will also eventually be pointed towards. If you are going to go for value then you have to be able to identify some kind of catalyst for that value to be released – or at least made obvious to the rest of the market.
You have to know that private equity is on the way or that an activist investor is about to kick up a stink within a year or so. Without that certainty about both value and change you have to leave the value on the table – and stick with buying shares in companies that are showing obvious growth (just like everyone else).
So mostly you leave the value on the table. Even the most determined of value investors have to recognise this. Look to the Scottish Investment Trust (which I hold) and its high conviction, contrarian value approach for example.
We never buy a stock just because it is cheap, says the trust’s manager, Alasdair McKinnon. “The quantitative appeal of the valuation must be mirrored by qualitative attractions such as strong leadership or enduring competitive advantage. Crucially, there must be clear catalysts for improvement; we want the company to positively surprise.”
Even that isn’t always enough of course: McKinnon’s trust has done well in the last six months but underperformed over three and five years. The board – while not necessarily planning to change manager – are inviting alternative management proposals. See why most managers end up leaving value on the table?
Private investors have the advantage over fund managers
That’s bad news for most fund investors, but it is really good news for the kind of investors who are happy buying individual shares. You can wait three years, five years or even more for the catalyst – particularly if you are collecting dividends along the way.
You need some certainty about value – but very little about change. No time-sensitive probability calculations are required. In some sense then, your calculations of value are closer to those of a private equity investor than a fund manager – you can pay a little more than they can.
How do you capitalise on this? The UK market is particularly vulnerable to private equity at the moment as it’s one of the cheapest global markets. So a FTSE 100 ETF isn’t a bad way to start (you’ll get a bit of all uplifts).
The brave and patient can go a step further, recognise that they don’t need “clear catalysts” and make their own portfolio of cheap stocks. Choose your long-term target – McKinnon suggests engineering group Babcock (LSE:BAB).
The shares are down by 70% in the last five years and no one has much good to say about the firm or its accounting, but it has a perfectly good new management team. That team might improve matters –or a private equity buyer might. Buy and wait.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/investment-strategy/603501/if-a-company-is-cheap-enough-for-private-equity-why-isnt-it
via IFTTT
EURUSD overview 05-09 July 2021
EURUSD
Last week the US Dollar had a strong overall performance, although after a solid non-farm payroll jobs report, the US dollar rally lost ground as the market corrected into the close on Friday. It’s too early to judge whether there is a bearish reversal for the Greenback, however, a strong risk-on sentiment could limit the dollar’s upside efforts going forward.
This week’s news from the Eurozone generally favors the economic outlook for the region. Eurozone economic confidence came to 117.9 in June, above forecasts and the highest level in more than two decades, after 114.5 in May. This success from the reopening of the economy was evident in the services confidence component, which jumped to 17.9 in June from 11.3 in May. In addition, other important activity data also show encouraging evidence of the impact of the opening of the economy. German retail sales in May rose 4.2% m/m, reversing most of the April sales decline, while French household consumption rose 10.4% m/m, reversing all of April’s declines.
In June the headline CPI fell to 1.9% year-on-year, while the core CPI also fell to 0.9% year-on-year. Inflation trends are likely to pick up in the coming months due to the underlying effect of some shortages and supply bottlenecks. On Thursday, ECB policymakers will meet in Frankfurt in a bid to finalize a review of the institution’s strategy.
Technical Levels
EURUSD closed the week above the 1.1846 support (previous week’s low) at 1.1865, slightly up +0.14% on Friday. The total decline last week was 0.53%. The intraday bias remains inclined to the downside for the next wave of declines which is limited by the temporary low of 1.1806. If there is a break of this low, the asset will test the next low at 1.1703. This condition is supported by the average price movement below Kumo and AO which are still in the selling area despite the apparent unconfirmed temporary divergence of the AO and the low price descending from the chart.
EURUSD, H4
Friday’s candle, although pin bar in shape, has not surpassed the previous Thursday’s high; this at least indicates limited interest from the bulls. A price move above the 1.1830 minor resistance will target 1.1974, but as long as the price remains below the 1.2000 psychological level the bearish pressure will remain real for some time to come.
In the larger period, the overall trend is still supported by the support level 1.1600. Sustained downside movement from current positions will target 1.1703 and if strong will equalize 1.1601. A move below 1.1601 would strengthen the retracement to 50.0% (1.1500) levels first and then 61.8% (1.1287). As long as the 1.1600 level holds, consolidation on the upside will continue for the trading space to narrow further in a triangle pattern. A move above 1.2000 would be a continuation of the March 2020 rebound but will face resistances at 1.2265 and 1.2349.
Click here to access our Economic Calendar
Ady Phangestu
Analyst – HF Indonesia
Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
from HF Analysis /250315/
via IFTTT
Market Spotlight: OPEC+ Meetings In Focus
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/market-spotlight-opec-meetings-in-focus"
via IFTTT
Precious Metals Monday 05-07-2021
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/precious-metals-monday-05-07-2021"
via IFTTT
Don’t count resources out
Commodities have performed poorly over the past year, but they tend to move in long and volatile cycles. from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://m...
-
The new strain of covid found in South Africa could disrupt plans by governments and central banks to rebuild economies. Financial markets a...
-
Fidelity “FIS” is a global financial services technology company and a leader in providing technology solutions to merchants, banks and cap...
-
Asian Equities Sink on Covid FearsIt’s been a mixed start to the week for global equities benchmarks with US and European asset markets rema...

