Wednesday, February 2, 2022
Rising EU Inflation Unlikely to Force ECB to Change its Mind
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/rising-eu-inflation-unlikely-to-force-ecb-to-change-its-mind"
via IFTTT
Midweek Market Podcast – February 2
January concluded with weak and volatile stock markets and the worst start to a year since 2009 as the USA500 lost over 5%. February starts with Central Banks and worries over inflation and geopolitical tensions, topped by NFP on Friday.
The Market Week – February Week 1
The financial markets remain nervous and volatile against the background of geopolitical risk, with stocks in January 2022 posting losses more than 5%, the worst since 2009, and the Dollar and Yields gaining over 1.5%. February has kicked off with a mixed bag of PMI & Jobs data and an overall dovish RBA. Still to come are BoE & ECB tomorrow and NFP on Friday.
Central banks clearly are getting nervous about the risk of second round effects, but the IMF’s growth downgrades also highlighted the risks from slowing momentum in China. The RBA will terminate their QE purchases this month but still maintain a dovish stance on “transitory” inflation. The BoE are likely to hike by at least 25 bps tomorrow with the ECB sliding to hawkishness but staying put on rates for now.
Ukraine tensions and speculation over gas supplies to Europe in the event of an escalation of tensions with Russia continues to weigh on sentiment. The West continues to bolster Ukraine and Russia continues to claim that their security concerns are not being taken seriously. North Korea tested its biggest missile since 2009 this week too.
In FX the USDIndex was off its highs earlier in the week at 97.40 as the USD cooled. Next support is the 20-day moving average around 96.00. EURUSD is up from 1.1121 lows to test 1.1300 once again and USDJPY has moved down from 115.50+ highs to 114.30. Cable has stalled its fall at 1.3360 this week and although the political turmoil in Westminster is far from over, with more calls for the PM’s resignation, the pair trades north of 1.3500 at 1.3540. However, Sterling remains vulnerable to bouts of risk aversion.
US stock markets had a recovery last week, but closed significantly lower to end January. The USA500 spiked down to 4,260 but has since moved to test the 100-day moving average at 4,570. The USA30 is on its 6th consecutive day higher, testing 35,500 from 33,600 lows, and the tech heavy USA100 is back over the key 200-day moving at 15,200, having posted 7-month lows last week.
Gold sank from its 10-week high last week at $1853, to test down to as low as $1780 this week. Subsequent weakness in the USD this week and continuing geopolitical tensions has lifted the key precious metal to the $1800 pivot point area. $1780 & $1770 are support areas with $1815, $1830 and $1850 resistance zones.
USOil prices continue to be supported by very tight supply, low inventories, and geopolitical tensions on top of concerns about further disruption. The key psychological $85.00 a barrel holds this week and the 7-year high at $87.80 is the next resistance area, as markets await the outcome of today’s OPEC+ meeting which is likely to see supplies maintained at 400k barrels per day.
The yields remain the key driver of the markets once again, and the US 10-Year Treasury Note breached the key 1.80%, as markets remain extremely volatile amid conflicting dynamics, economic data and geopolitical tensions.
Click here to access our Economic Calendar
Stuart Cowell
Head Market Analyst
Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distribution.
from HF Analysis /307201/
via IFTTT
Market Spotlight: First OPEC+ Meeting of 2022
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/market-spotlight-first-opec-meeting-of-2022"
via IFTTT
Music Legends Clash With Spotify Over Rogan Anti-Vax Controversy
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/music-legends-clash-with-spotify-over-rogan-anti-vax-controversy"
via IFTTT
Five reasons to buy silver – and five reasons not to
Today we consider silver. One day it will go to the moon – it has close ties with that planet, after all.
The question is whether it is worth the wait – “one day” and “within reasonable investment time horizons” are not the same thing.
The latter suggests three to five years; the former could mean a lifetime. Or more.
Five reasons you should rush out and buy silver
I’ve said it before: there is probably no investment with as much potential as silver, except perhaps some little-known tech that neither you nor I can understand. Yet there is no investment more frustrating.
With that in mind, today I offer you five reasons to buy silver – and five reasons not to. Balance is everything, after all.
Let’s start with why you should go all in and buy.
1. Silver is cheap
The all-time high for silver was $50/oz, a price set a long time ago in the mists of time. Well, 1980. $50 was subsequently re-tested in 2011. The re-test failed.
Today silver sits at $22.60 – that’s 55% lower. Is there any other asset, let alone a commodity, that is trading at such a discount to its all-time highs, especially with all the currency debasement that has gone on? It’s so cheap.
2. Silver should be much more expensive
There is roughly 15 times as much silver in the earth’s crust as there is gold, thus, the silver price should be 15 times the gold price. Indeed, that is the historical average. And by historical average I mean in Ancient Mesopotamia, in Ancient Greece, in the Dark and Middle Ages, in the Early Modern Era, right up to the 20th century.
Today the silver price is 79 times the gold price. A return to the historical average would mean silver five times higher, above $100/oz. And that’s assuming there is no appreciation in the gold price.
What’s more, silver gets consumed and so no longer exists; gold does not – it remains. Thus, really, the ratio should be lower than 15.
3. The silver price is suppressed (so the story goes)
The amount of silver sold forward on the Comex amounts to more than one year’s supply. In other words, the silver that has been sold can’t be delivered. Sooner or later this means there is going to be a run on physical silver. And the price will go bananas.
4. Silver has myriad uses
Silver is the best thermal and electrical conductor of all metals, so every phone, every computer, every TV, every (decent) battery, every photovoltaic cell contains silver. Before the invention/discovery of antibiotics, silver was the world’s most important antimicrobial agent. These antimicrobial, non-toxic qualities mean it has huge demand in medicine and consumer products – from biocides to fridges to paint.
Its high reflectivity means it has demand in jewellery, silverware, mirrors and solar energy. It is malleable and ductile which means it can be beaten into sheets, drawn into wire, reduced into nanosilver or turned into paste – thus a plethora of industrial applications require it. Then there are its catalytic properties, which means it finds use in plastics, nuclear energy, the brazing and soldering; its photosensitivity…
In short, it is nothing short of amazing how many uses this incredibly versatile metal is. If you want a picks-and-shovels play on cutting edge technology and man’s never-ending progress, surely silver is it. Everything uses it!
5. Silver is money
The word even means money – a pound was once a pound of sterling silver. “Argent” is silver. “Plata” is silver. In this age of relentless currency debasement, money-printing and inflation, you need to protect yourself. Silver, as a monetary and precious metal, does that.
Five reasons not to touch silver
And now for the rebuttals.
1. Silver isn’t cheap
Those two all-time highs are illusory figures. The 1980 high came at the end of the inflation of the 1970s, when the Hunt brothers infamously attempted to corner the market and triggered a panic. The 2011 high came after a speculative frenzy accompanied by a false silver shortage narrative at the end of a decade-long bull market. While those highs do show what’s possible, they mean nothing.
2. Ratios don’t matter
Who cares what the historical average is? There may be 15 times more silver in the earth’s crust, but it’s a lot easier to mine than the gold is. Indeed, most silver is produced as a by-product of mining for other metals, zinc especially.
Many of the world’s largest silver producers are not even silver companies - Glencore, Codelco, Vedanta (Hindustan Zinc), Southern Copper, Polymetal, Newmont. Silver makes up such a small part of their revenue that the price is (almost) unimportant.
The market sets the price. Not the earth’s crust.
3. Silver isn’t being suppressed
Price manipulation stories have been doing the rounds since the 1970s. They have lost their credibility. The derivatives market is always bigger than the physical markets; if you looked at the magnitude of the global derivatives market, you’d be packing your tins and guns and making for the hills tomorrow (with lots of silver coins).
It’s only when you realise most of them cancel each other out, then calmness returns. If the price is suppressed, there is nothing you can do anyway. Only worry about what you can affect, and all that. Let nefarious silver-price-manipulation narratives be somebody else’s problem.
4. Silver is useful but you don’t need much
Yes, silver’s myriad uses are amazing, but the amount of silver required for pretty much all of them is minuscule, so it doesn’t have much effect on prices. Current physical supplies meet demand, particularly when you factor in recycling. If there was a genuine shortage, you’d know about it pretty quickly. There isn’t – that’s why the price is low.
5. Money has moved on
Silver may have been money once upon a time, but it isn’t now. It hasn’t been money for a hundred years or more and it’s unlikely ever to be again. It’s as irrelevant to money as the horse is to transport. Money is no longer physical; it is digital, and cryptocurrencies are the money of the future – metal isn’t
As for being a hedge against inflation, silver’s been useless. How much money has been printed since 1980? How much has currency been debased? And silver is trading at the same price it was 40 years ago. Come off it – it’s been a rotten inflation hedge.
And so there we have it. Five reasons to own silver, and five reasons not to. How about that for balance?
I will say this: I own silver; I don’t think I’ve ever known an investment with as much potential. But it never delivers.
It’s like that talented genius you know. They could do anything, but they always find a way to screw up. You can only look at them, shake your head and go, “if only”.
Dominic’s film, Adam Smith: Father of the Fringe, about the unlikely influence of the father of economics on the greatest arts festival in the world is now available to watch on YouTube.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/commodities/silver-and-other-precious-metals/604409/five-reasons-to-buy-silver-and-five-reasons-not-to
via IFTTT
RBA Governor Says 2022 Rate Hike Now "Plausible"
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/rba-governor-says-2022-rate-hike-now-plausible"
via IFTTT
Dollar Edges Lower; Alphabet Results Boost Risk Sentiment
from Forex News https://www.investing.com/news/forex-news/dollar-edges-lower-alphabet-results-boost-risk-sentiment-2754913
via IFTTT
China’s largest real estate broker and why you should short its shares
One key structural feature of the Chinese economy over the past 15 years has been the booming property market. Thanks to a combination of rapid economic growth, loose monetary policy and Beijing’s decision to put housebuilding and construction at the forefront of a series of fiscal stimulus packages, the Chinese real estate sector is the largest in the world. Indeed, China’s property market is now worth twice as much as the US property market, even though the US economy is still 50% larger in dollar terms (and only slightly smaller when differences in purchasing power are accounted for). However, this boom seems about to come to a messy end.
Beijing has slammed on the brakes, restricting access to credit and tightening regulations, in a (belated) attempt to deflate the bubble. In the past, attempts to rein in the sector have ended without much impact, partly because the Chinese government feared that a slowdown in the sector would have too much of an impact on growth. However, the current crackdown seems more serious. Not only has the number of new building projects collapsed, but many Chinese property groups are now in trouble, most notably Evergrande, which technically defaulted last month, and is undergoing an official “restructuring”.
China’s property woes
While not quite on the scale of Evergrande, another company which stands to lose from the fallout is KE Holdings (NYSE: BEKE). It claims to be China’s largest real estate broker in terms of transaction numbers – according to its figures, its sales more than doubled between 2017 and 2020. As a result, its share price also doubled only a few months after it listed in the US in August 2020. However, its share price has since fallen by more than two-thirds, as doubts about Chinese property continue to grow. To add insult to injury, Muddy Waters Capital, run by noted short-seller Carson Block, published a report in December querying some of the figures KE has produced regarding sales and transactions.
Yet even if its figures are accurate, KE Holdings seems overvalued, trading at 35.4 times 2022 earnings. Assuming the Chinese real estate market doesn’t collapse (a big assumption, as things stand), KE’s growth is set to fall to a more modest 10% a year. Meanwhile it faces intense competition from other national brands, as well as local brokers, who are willing to charge a fraction of its 2% fee on every sale. Another concern is the fact that it is struggling to use its capital productively, producing a measly return on capital employed (ROCE) of around 2% a year. Unless it is able to increase this, its growth will effectively be destroying value.
Overall, with the share price still drifting lower I’d suggest shorting KE Holdings at the current price of $21.74 at £90 per $1. I’d cover your position if it rises above $32.74. This gives you a possible downside of £990.
Trading techniques: the skyscraper index
Last October, as part of a crackdown on “speculative” real estate projects, the Chinese authorities ordered that local cities stop building “super high-rise buildings”. The ban was prompted by a number of cases where buildings had experienced problems (most notably in Shenzen, where people had to be evacuated from one skyscraper). Yet it’s somewhat ironic because tall buildings are also typically associated with stockmarket bubbles.
While there are various versions of the “skyscraper index”, the basic logic is that skyscrapers tend to be poor investments, producing low returns. So for skyscrapers to be built, their backers need to be driven more by vanity or irrational optimism, rather than commercial logic; there needs to be a dearth of more profitable and practical investment opportunities to exploit; and, since they are usually funded with borrowed money, credit also has to be widely and easily available (a key factor associated with bubbles).
There is anecdotal evidence to support the idea that the building of record-breaking towers coincides with market crashes. Construction of the Empire State Building began a few months after the Wall Street Crash, while the original World Trade Centre in New York and the Sears Tower in Chicago were both started in the early 1970s, just before another bear market. Dubai’s Burj Khalifa (currently the largest building in the world) was still being built during the global financial crisis.
However, a study in 2015 by Bruce Mizrach, Jason Barr, and Kusum Mundra of Rutgers University, comparing construction dates for the world’s highest buildings with changes in economic output, argued that such buildings tend to follow – rather than predict – the economic cycle.
How my tips have fared
Despite the recent market turbulence, my long tips haven’t done as badly as you might expect, with three rising and three falling. US homebuilder DR Horton fell below the stop-loss level of $88 (which means you would have automatically closed the position). Construction firm Morgan Sindall fell from 2,362p to 2,150p, while wealth manager Rathbone Group dropped from 2,060p to 1,866p. However, supermarket J Sainsbury went up from 279p to 285p, mobile phone group Airtel Africa rose from 135p to 149p, and bus company National Express rose from 255p to 264p. Counting DR Horton, my long tips are making a profit of £3,210, down from £3,823.
The overall performance of my long tips may have been disappointing, but the silver lining to the market turmoil is that my short tips moved in my favour, especially as technology and so-called meme stocks, have done particularly badly over the past fortnight. Online marketing group HubSpot fell from $530 to $455, US cinema chain AMC slid from $22.78 to $16.64, while remote medicine firm Teladoc went down from $79.80 to $73.18. Overall, my shorts are making a profit of £2,597.
Looking over the portfolio, I have five long tips (Morgan Sindall, Rathbone Group, J Sainsbury, Airtel Africa and National Express), plus four short tips (KE Holdings, HubSpot, AMC and Teladoc). While I wouldn’t suggest you close any of the current long positions, I’d raise the stop loss on Morgan Sindall to 1,875p (from 1,850p); on J Sainsbury to 1,550p (from 1,500p); on Airtel Africa to 105p (from 95p); and on National Express to 130p (from 123p). I’d also cut the price at which you cover your AMC short to $40 (from $45), and cover Teladoc at $150 (from $210).
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/trading/604401/chinas-largest-real-estate-broker-and-why-you-should-short-its-shares
via IFTTT
Investment Bank Outlook 02-02-2022
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/investment-bank-outlook-02-02-2022"
via IFTTT
Tuesday, February 1, 2022
AUDUSD Rally Looks Weak as RBA Disappoints Hawks
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/audusd-rally-looks-weak-as-rba-disappoints-hawks"
via IFTTT
Egypt's Suez Canal revenues reach $544.7 million in Jan - statement
from Forex News https://www.investing.com/news/forex-news/egypts-suez-canal-revenues-reach-5447-million-in-jan--statement-2754119
via IFTTT
Market Spotlight: CAD GDP in Focus Next
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/market-spotlight-cad-gdp-in-focus-next"
via IFTTT
Market crashes: what happens when investors believe the impossible
For those confused by the market this year, I have a suggestion: invest in the Practical History of Financial Markets course run by the Edinburgh Business School (you can do it online – no need to come to chilly Scotland). One of the modules focuses on the history of extreme market valuations – what causes them and what crashes them.
The first thing to note is that, while we love to talk about bubbles, periods of extreme valuation in the stockmarket don’t really happen very often. Of the 29 business cycles in the US since 1881 only a few have ended in one, according to Professor Russell Napier. But, while each has had its own peculiarities, the basic driver has been much the same: the ability of investors to believe absolutely in something that always turns out to be impossible. Namely that, thanks to some “marvels” of technology, corporate profits will stay high (and probably rise) indefinitely and that interest rates will also stay low indefinitely.
In most cycles investors do not think this, they assume cyclical normality – that fast economic growth will lead to capacity constraints and then to inflation and rate rises, something that would slow both economic growth and crimp corporate profits, thus bringing down valuations. We like to think of equities as all sorts of things; right now, for example, all too many investors think of them primarily as virtue signalling vehicles (witness the now collapsing bubble in renewable energy stocks).
But in the long term, equities aren’t about feelings or show ponying, they are about the net present value of all future income streams discounted at whatever the discount rate is at the time. That’s it. So, discount rate up; value down (usually when inflation hits about 4%).
A proper bubble can then only develop if investors do not assume cyclical normality but instead manage to convince themselves (against all historical experience) that it is possible for a high-profit, low-inflation environment to be permanent. This always ends badly – think 1901, 1921, 1929, 1966, 2000, 2007, briefly 2020, and possibly right now.
The only question is how fast it ends badly. The key thing here, says Napier in his lectures, is which bit of the equation investors have been getting wrong. If it is the belief that interest rates will never rise, you tend to get a long drawn out bear market (from 1966, when it would have been hard to imagine the inflation of the late 1970s). If it is more the belief that corporate earnings will stay high forever, it tends to be shorter and sharper (2020 was a mini classic of this genre of crash).
What have investors got wrong this time?
So here we are. Inflation has been minimal for years; US corporate profits have been very high and rising for years – they hit yet another record high in the third quarter of 2021. And of course, as a result, US stockmarket valuations hit bubble levels some time ago: by the end of last year the cyclically adjusted price/earnings ratio (Cape) was knocking at about 40, more than double its long-term average. Investors have once again been believing too many impossible things before breakfast – something they might be starting to realise.
So here’s the question: which bit have we got most wrong this time around? Is it the discount rate or corporate profits? The discount rate feels like the obvious one, although rising interest rates obviously hit corporate margins too.
Cheap labour and globalisation long ago made inflation no more than a distant nightmare for older investors and a mystery to younger ones. Most thus fell for the nonsense from central banks last year that the fast-rising inflation they were seeing was transitory. And even those that thought it might last beyond, say, Easter still believed that central banks would hold off raising rates regardless.
So the fact that high growth (US gross domestic product grew by 6.9% in the last quarter of 2021) really can slam into capacity constraints and create inflation rates starting with sevens is turning out to be a horrible shock – as are the indications that central banks might actually do something about it.
The Federal Reserve, under pressure from the inflation itself and possibly also from polls suggesting that said inflation is not helping Joe Biden, is now changing tune (no more “transitory”). There is even, says Aegon Asset Management, “a reasonable probability of seven rate hikes this year, one at each meeting”. Illusion-shattering stuff.
It also leaves investors with little choice: as long as the Fed holds this line they should surely not buy dips but sell rallies – at least when it comes to their most expensive holdings (we can argue about whether the likes of Peloton, down 80% in six months, is still expensive or not). In inflationary times, value today starts to look like it might be worth more than possible value tomorrow (a bird in the hand is worth a lot more than an electric flying car in the bush).
With that in mind, it is worth noting that the FTSE 100, with its reasonably valued income generating stocks, is outperforming the S&P 500 – so much so that it is now on track to have outperformed over 12-months by the end of this month – something it hasn’t done for a full year since May 2017. But it is a switch I suspect most Practical History of Financial Markets students were ready for.
• This article was first published in the Financial Times
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stockmarkets/604406/market-crashes-what-happens-when-investors-believe-the-impossible
via IFTTT
The IndeX Files 01-02-2022
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/the-index-files-01-02-2022"
via IFTTT
Don’t count resources out
Commodities have performed poorly over the past year, but they tend to move in long and volatile cycles. from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://m...
-
The new strain of covid found in South Africa could disrupt plans by governments and central banks to rebuild economies. Financial markets a...
-
Fidelity “FIS” is a global financial services technology company and a leader in providing technology solutions to merchants, banks and cap...
-
Asian Equities Sink on Covid FearsIt’s been a mixed start to the week for global equities benchmarks with US and European asset markets rema...


