Wednesday, April 6, 2022
USDCHF, H4 I Potential Drop
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/usdchf-h4-i-potential-drop6"
via IFTTT
GBPAUD Next Support 1.7000?
The BoE is expected to raise interest rates in the second quarter of 2022, as Britain’s central bank tries to stem surging price pressures. The BoE raised its Bank Rate to 0.75% from 0.1% at the end of 2021 and money markets are currently forecasting an additional 125 basis point hike in interest rates this year. The latest BoE monetary policy releases show that the UK central bank expects headline inflation to top 8% in the coming months, citing high energy and food prices as the main drivers of the move.
The latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) inflation release showed headline inflation hit 6.2% in February, a fresh 30-year high, while core inflation rose to 5.2% from 4.4% in January. And even higher inflation rates are expected in Q2 this year. The UK’s central bank recently pushed back on these market expectations, concerned that a series of gains could hamper growth in the months ahead. UK growth is now back above pre-covid levels and looks strong, despite concerns that the Ukraine crisis and Russian sanctions will lead to further supply chain disruptions.
The GBPAUD exchange rate fell to four-year lows at the start of the new week and could risk slipping further towards 1.7000 over the coming days, after the Reserve Bank of Australia indicated in its April monetary policy statement that interest rates could still meet market expectations for a hike at the end of the year. The RBA noted that Australian inflation and wage growth had been picking up steadily in recent months, which was marked as a precondition for a hike in Australia’s benchmark interest rate. The RBA has made small steps to become less dovish in recent months, and the tone of today’s policy statement has added to the market perception that the RBA may raise interest rates in the not too distant future. Central banks of advanced economies are gradually withdrawing support for pandemic-era monetary policy, due to the sharp increase in inflation which far exceeds the targeted level in most cases, and the risk that it could remain above the target for a long time.
While financial markets have largely priced in the anticipated rate hike cycle that is likely to be seen in Australia, any reversal of the market’s large short positions would be an upside risk for the Australian Dollar and a potential source of continued pressure on the GBPAUD for some time to come.
Technical Overview
GBPAUD,D1 This cross is very vulnerable to a move to the downside, as long as commodity prices remain hot. Technically the bearish support is still very dominant, having surpassed several important support levels. Currently, GBPAUD is leveling its 4-year low of 1.7208 formed in December 2018. Meanwhile, the latest price has broken down to 1.7133. A daily close below 1.7208 has the potential to bring a move to test the 1.7000 psychological round figure mark. Even in the long term, if the conflict conditions in eastern Europe that sent commodity prices to a peak have not subsided, the Australian Dollar will still benefit. However, if the pair holds in consolidation around 1.7200 the minor correction ripple could also test the immediate resistance around 1.7619 or at 1.7731.
Broadly speaking, bear dominance remains with the upper hand and there is no indication of a trend change or correction wave yet.
Click here to access our Economic Calendar
Ady Phangestu
Market Analyst
Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distribution.
from HF Analysis /326156/
via IFTTT
Investment Bank Outlook 06-04-2022
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/investment-bank-outlook-06-04-2022"
via IFTTT
Market Update – April 6 – Treasury yields soared & FOMC Minutes ahead
- USD & Treasury yields have been rising. Stock markets have been under pressure, was hit by the surge in yields with the tech-heavy index (USA100) plunging -2.26% as selling picked up into the close.
- The market has priced in a lot of bearish elements, yields shot higher again on hawkish comments from Fed, RBA. Disappointing China PMI reports weighted on both bond and stock market sentiment.
- USOil up to $1002.48 as the west mulls further sanctions against Russia. – Saudi which boosted prices by over by $2 per barrel in late March
- US coal prices climbed over $100 a ton today for the first time in 13 years after the EU said it is mulling restricting coal imports from Russia.
- US Rates on the 5-, 7-, and 10-year maturities were up almost 17 bps to 2.7108%, 2.678%, and 2.565%, respectively. The bond was 13.5 bps higher at 2.596%, while the 2-year rose over 10 bps to 2.526%. The curve bear steepened to 4.8 bps, after having been inverted for the prior three sessions at -3 bps Monday and -8 bps Friday.
- USD (USDIndex 99.72) rallied from 98.80 yesterday.
- Equities – USA500 -72.15 (1.57%) at 4530. US500 FUTS 4547. Banks & Technology stocks led the broadbased month end decline.
- Gold – steady at $1920 low after 1947 high yesterday.
- Bitcoin closing the gap at 45370?
- FX markets – EURUSD dipped to 1.0883, USDJPY continued to struggle at 124.04, Cable back to 1.3120 now. AUD and NZD also remained supported as yields moved higher.
European Open – The German manufacturing orders came in much weaker than expected – with orders falling -2.2% m/m in February. The actual slump was a surprise that will add to concerns that the German manufacturing sector could be heading for recession as the spike in energy prices and supply chain disruptions hit Germany’s industrial core. Exports orders dropped -3.3% in February.
FOMC preview: the minutes should prove very interesting to the markets as they should provide details on the balance sheet run off. We’ll also read the various comments about the abrupt, hawkish pivot from the FOMC. Of course the threat of surging inflation and the likelihood that it would not prove as “transitory” as expected, along with the robust recovery and strength in the labor market were the major factors finally forcing the Fed to shift into high gear and accelerating the pace of trimming accommodation and then toward eyeing aggressive rate hikes. The dot plot reflected the pivot, and Fedspeak since then has affirmed it. Governor Brainard’s comments Tuesday, in fact, indicated the Fed would announce the start of balance sheet reduction as soon as May. She also supported her colleagues’ views on the need for a larger and speedier pace of balance sheet runoff. We will look for details on that in the minutes. We suspect at a minimum the Fed will double the pace of that from the last cycle with $60 bln in Treasuries and $30 bln in MBS, although the still hot housing market could see a higher cap on MBS.
Today –
Biggest FX Mover @ (07:30 GMT) USDCHF (+0.37%) At 6-day highs and close to R2 at 0.9331. Next resistance 0.9376. MAs aligned higher, MACD signal line & histogram higher & over 0 line, RSI 77 & rising, H1 ATR 0.00087, Daily ATR 0.00617.
Click here to access our Economic Calendar
Andria Pichidi
Μarket Analyst
Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distribution.
from HF Analysis /326097/
via IFTTT
The cost of living crisis is getting worse, here's what to do about it
Inflation in the UK is running at 6.2% a year (if you use the consumer price index – CPI), or as much as 8.3% (judged by the old retail price index-based measure that used to form the basis of the Bank of England’s inflation target). Unfortunately, this month the cost of living squeeze is only set to get worse. Here’s what’s changing – and what you can do to lessen the impact.
The deep freeze on allowances
The personal allowance (the level of earnings at which you start paying income tax) will be held at £12,570 until 2026, while the higher-rate income tax threshold will be frozen at £50,270. This is “probably the biggest change coming in from 6 April”, says AJ Bell. Usually these thresholds would increase in line with inflation “to offer some protection to taxpayers”, but it’s proved an irresistible stealth tax for
the chancellor.
Similarly, on the asset taxation front, the capital gains tax (CGT) allowance remains frozen at £12,300 until 2026, while the inheritance tax threshold is also staying at £325,000, which will “start to bite into estates” that grow in value over the next four years. While the chancellor did announce plans to cut income tax from 20% to 19%, this is little comfort as it’s not due until 2024.
The health and social care levy
The threshold at which national insurance (NI) starts to be paid will rise to £9,880 from £9,568 in April, and then to £12,570 (matching the personal allowance) in July. But from 6 April most workers will also start to pay the health and social care levy, which is an increase of 1.25 percentage points on NI contributions, driving rates from 12% on earnings up to £50,270 and 2% on anything above that to 13.25% and 3.25% respectively. Taking the changes to the NI threshold from July into account, a worker on £30,000 will be better off overall, paying £2,309 a year in NI contributions, down £143 from the current £2,452.
However, someone earning £50,000 will pay £4,959, up £107 from their current contribution of £4,852.
Investors should note that dividend tax is rising along with the NI increase, which means basic-rate taxpayers pay 8.75% on dividend income; higher-rate taxpayers 33.75%; and additional rate 39.35%.
State pensions and energy prices
Households already struggling with rising costs will also have to deal with an increase in the energy price cap, which is a regulatory cap on the amount per unit of gas and electricity that utility companies can charge. Based on average household usage, it is rising by an eye-watering 54%, from £1,277 to £1,971 from 1 April, although of course that will vary depending on your individual usage.
The regulator is playing catch-up with soaring energy prices, and there’s no guarantee that October (the next time the price cap changes) won’t see another significant increase.
As for pensions, the state pension will rise with the rate of inflation (as measured by CPI), but that’s based on the figure from September 2021, which means an increase of just 3.1%. Meanwhile, the pensions lifetime allowance (LTA) – the total pension pot you can accumulate over a lifetime before being taxed at 55% on the excess – will be frozen at £1,073,100 for another four years.
Practical solutions
There are few government measures to help, although do check your council tax band – houses in bands A to D in England will get a £150 rebate on their council tax bills in April. If you pay by direct debit, this will be paid into your account directly. Otherwise, contact your council. Also ensure you use your individual savings account and pension allowances this year – at least those shield you from CGT and dividend taxes.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/personal-finance/604652/the-cost-of-living-crisis-is-about-to-get-worse-in-april-heres-what-to-do
via IFTTT
Tuesday, April 5, 2022
Why the nagging approach can make boards more active
When the limited liability company first got going as a popular structure not everyone was convinced it could work. Here’s Adam Smith on the matter in The Wealth of Nations (published in 1776): “The directors of such companies . . . being the managers rather of other people’s money than of their own, it cannot well be expected that they should watch over it with the same anxious vigilance with which the partners in a private copartnery frequently watch over their own.”
The question back then was who would make them — and how. Almost 250 years on, this has still not been properly answered.
The obvious bit is the who — it should be the actual owners of the company, the shareholders. The less obvious bit is the how: if every large listed company has millions of separate beneficial owners, how can they all co-ordinate to hold a board’s feet to the fire?
Average AGM attendance rate is falling
Long term they mostly haven’t been able to — and managers have been left to do their own thing. More recently the rise of giant asset management companies such as BlackRock and others has meant an effective contracting out of nagging the directors to a new group of powerful middlemen.
That has sort of worked — in that there is lots of nagging. But there needs to be more. Link, the investor services business, notes that the average AGM attendance rate in the UK has fallen even in the last year (from 75.9 per cent in 2020 to 73.9 per cent in 2021). It also tends to be the wrong kind of nagging — often generalised asks (adopt a net zero climate target, appoint a diverse board etc), driven by box-ticking from big proxy advisers such as ISS and devoid of much actual strategic challenge.
During the 2020-21 proxy season, BlackRock voted for one or more directors on an activist slate in only 15 per cent of US proxy contests (attempts by activists to get new directors on the board). Mostly they support management as it is. That’s a shame — as it does little to neutralise the tendency to “negligence and profusion” that Smith worried about.
Active shareholders have generated robust returns
For evidence, look to the generally higher returns from private equity, where owners are obviously active. The returns to investors here may be in the round no higher than those from the stock market.
But add in the managers’ take (usually several percentage points) and one could argue that the total return is higher. You might say that this is partly to do with their use of leverage but it also suggests that owner engagement matters. Studies from McKinsey over the past 20 years have generally found that the more active the owners of a company — and hence the board — the more effective a board.
There are, of course, many excellent activist shareholders around and, increasingly, there are also unexpected causes in the mix. There have been high-profile moves this year from activist investor Carl Icahn — he bought a stake in McDonald's and nominated two new directors to its board in an effort to change the thoroughly unpleasant way the firm treats pigs.
He is doing something similar at Kroger in a bid to change their treatment of workers and animals. There’s also been an interesting rise in more conservative activism (pushing for more scrutiny of racial equity programmes, for example).
Overall, activist campaigns in 2021 (the ones that ended up public at least) were more or less back to pre-pandemic levels. At the same time there is a trend towards a less confrontational form of activism: Pershing Square Capital Management, long one of the most vocal of these firms, plans to take a more “positive constructive” approach than in the past.
The problem is that, for most companies, having anything close to what you might call active owners is still more the exception than the norm. Passive investors are far too passive and, despite the impressive efforts of many grassroots groups, retail investors still have little way of effectively demanding any change.
How can we change this?
The first part of the answer is not the way the SEC are currently attempting it. Their plan to force activists building stakes in companies to disclose them very early on in the process will be remarkably unhelpful. If they have to disclose before building the kind of stake that gives them a voice, the profit motive rather disappears.
The SEC would be much better to focus on creating more direct pathways between shareholder and company.
There’s a lot going on in this space. In the UK this week, for example, Link introduced a new app that should ease the voting process for shareholders. But if we really want to make things simple — and to get public companies acting more like private ones — we might just work on the board.
In theory all boards represent all shareholders. In practise they tend to be bogged down in regulation compliance and succession issues, operating more as stewards than challengers.
A regulatory shift should require one well-supported non executive director to be fully responsible for shareholder communication and engagement — retail and institutional; for asking about and understanding what activist investors are thinking about; and for directly promoting their views on the board. Adding a little activist magic along the way might help change boards for the better.
• This article was first published in the Financial Times
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/investment-strategy/604668/why-the-nagging-approach-can-make-boards-more-attractive
via IFTTT
Lockdown winner Homeserve has had another strong year
At the end of March, Canadian financial powerhouse Brookfield Asset Management (TSE: BAM) announced that one of its private infrastructure funds was putting together a bid for the international home repairs and improvements business, HomeServe (LSE: HSV). That sent the FTSE 250 company’s share price soaring by 15%.
Yet while a full offer has yet to emerge (and there is no guarantee one will at this stage), Homeserve is not hanging around.
The home repair services industry was a big winner of pandemic lockdowns, and Homeserve has been a beneficiary. Customers who were stuck at home spent more time and money on renovations, validating the firm’s recent expansion.
Over its financial year to the end of March 2021, adjusted earnings rose by 3%. That’s pretty impressive given that many companies struggled just to stay afloat in the first year of the pandemic.
Demand for its services continues to grow. Adjusted earnings jumped by 27% in the six months to the end of September thanks to strong performance in its North America market.
And the company’s figures have continued to improve since then, according to its latest trading update.
Homeserve’s business is making progress on all fronts
In a trading update released today ahead of the publication of its full-year results at the end of May, the firm reported an “acceleration in performance” compared to its 2021 financial year.
In the year to end-March 2022, customer retention rose to 84% compared to 83%, while the number of “affinity partner” households grew by a net seven million (compared to two million previously) to 73 million (up from 66 million).
What’s an affinity partner? Under the scheme, utility companies allow Homeserve to provide services on their behalf to consumers. Utilities have the advantage of being able to rely on a trusted third-party brand with a wide customer base without needing to invest large amounts of time and resources. The agreement also benefits consumers who are able to access a range of services through one supplier (Homeserve).
The group also wants to help consumers burnish their green credentials. It has launched an installation and maintenance proposition for domestic electric vehicle charging. This is now available to nine million homes through a new 4.6 million household utility partnership.
Other products across the group also made decent progress, notably the Home Experts division, which owns the Checkatrade brand (which aims to help consumers find reliable tradespeople more easily).
This unit was profitable for the first time on a full-year basis, with Checkatrade leading the charge. The platform ended the year with 47,000 paying trades (up 7% year-on-year) and average revenue per trade is expected to exceed Homeserve’s “Milestone 1” target of £1,200.
The company ended the year with a net debt to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) ratio of two (up from 1.8 times last year), as acquisitions offset cash generated from operations.
Growth at a reasonable price – even if there’s no bid
A bid from Brookfield would be a nice windfall for shareholders, but Homeserve’s underlying growth is reassuring and picking up momentum. Further, the recurring nature of the company’s subscription business generates a steady stream of cash for the business to reinvest.
The broker consensus on 2022 earnings per share (according to Refinitiv data) is 48.7p. That’s a 14% increase on 2021. The resulting forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 18.2 does not look too demanding considering the recurring nature of the company’s business model.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/stockmarkets/uk-stockmarkets/604670/lockdown-winner-homeserve-has-had-another-strong
via IFTTT
Does Russia's move to price energy in roubles threaten the US dollar?
There's been a lot of excitement (if that's the right word) over the idea that Russia is no longer accepting dollars as payment for its energy.
Overall, it would prefer gold ("hard currency") or roubles, but it'll take most other national currencies as long as they're not greenbacks.
Is this the beginning of the end for US dollar hegemony?
The answer is "no".
Here's why...
The US dollar is not perfect...
Before we get into this I want to make one thing clear. I've written about the decline of the US dollar on several occasions in the past. I'm not a US dollar "maximalist" by any means.
It's clear that the US decided that the role of "World Police" was a burden and responsibility it could no longer be bothered to shoulder. The US dollar was also "weaponised" a long time ago. This weaponisation became overt as long ago as 2012, when Iran was sanctioned over its nuclear activities.
So anyone who feared that the US dollar might not be a financial operating system that was compatible with their own nation's values or ambitions had been given every reason to find alternatives well before the most recent sanctions were imposed on Russia.
Moreover, the US dollar has been declining as a share of central bank reserves for a long time. As economic professor and general currency commentator Barry Eichengreen pointed out in the FT the other day, the US dollar accounted for around 70% of foreign exchange reserves in 2001. Now it accounts for just 59%.
So dollar dominance as such, has been on the decline for some time. (Although "decline" in this case is probably the wrong word, because in fact what's happened is that most of this move out of the US dollar has been into smaller currencies – such as the Australian dollar, South Korean won, and Swedish krona – which have become increasingly viable as their markets have deepened, ie become more like American markets).
Anyway, all of this is to say that we are in complicated times, and that – as Eichengreen puts it – we are "already seeing movement towards a more multipolar international monetary system". I think it's also fair to say that the world has also been quietly hunting for an alternative to the post-1970s monetary order ever since the 2008 financial crisis.
But I don't feel that Russia's desire to trade energy in anything other than US dollars is particularly significant in terms of this hunt for a new monetary order.
... but what's the alternative?
Why not? You can argue that the US dollar is being debased by money printing. You can argue that the US is increasingly less reliable as a partner, given its willingness to cross the Rubicon when it comes to cutting countries off from the global reserve currency.
But you have to have an alternative. History shows that reserve currencies give way to one another when another comes along that is more attractive.
That's usually because the dominant power is on the way down, while the up and coming power is up and coming. That's how the pound gave way to the US dollar. But this is a simple symptom of the fact that capital flows to where it is treated best and where it finds the most opportunities.
The war has resulted in Russia losing capital of all kinds – financial, human, social. The country has had to impose capital controls in order to prevent capital from fleeing its borders. This is not the recipe for supplanting the global financial hegemon.
Think of it this way. Does Russia's demand to swap Russian energy for anything but US dollars make the world keen to find an alternative to US dollars? Or does it instead make most countries keener to find an alternative to Russian energy?
Neither Russia, nor China – the rising power today – have demonstrated any reason to trust them with your hard-earned capital. Russian property rights have always been built on a "gangster rules", "might is right" basis.
China loves foreign capital when it's made up of greedy overseas investors blindly recapitalising its banking system or foolish manufacturers handing over their intellectual property in hope of accessing a billion-odd Chinese consumers.
But when business people or shareholder capitalism start to kick off and threaten the grip of the Communist party or the social order, you see what happens. Mouthy entrepreneurs and A-listers vanish then come back three months later, much chagrined.
It's clear that China recognises that its recent approach has been toxic to foreign investment, and it is trying to wind that back. Hence the recent surge in Chinese tech stocks. This also explains its somewhat half-hearted support of Russia.
But I'd still be very wary of putting your money to work there.
The real threat to the US dollar is from the US abandoning its values
None of this is to say that the US dollar will be the global reserve currency forever. That’s just not how these things happen.
But the real risk to US dollar hegemony is internal. The real risk is that the US retreats from the things that make the dollar valuable as a reserve currency – rule of law; enforceable, well-respected property rights; and the protection of those rights for all, regardless of political perspective or socio-economic position.
That's why all this "culture war" stuff actually does matter. Creeping authoritarianism from within is a much greater threat to US dollar hegemony than the overt authoritarianism from hostile nations.
In short, the real risk stemming from weaponisation comes if and when a currency is weaponised against its own people.
Otherwise, the US only needs to worry if and when China decides to open up and embrace democracy and entirely free markets. Capital would flood in. But I suspect most of us would be rather happy about that because that's a pretty benign regime shift.
After all, for all the masochistic joy that some British people get in revelling in tales of decline, it's not as though Britain disappeared after the pound was no longer the world's reserve currency. Sterling remains significant and London is still by far and away one of the world's most important financial centres, underpinned largely by clear respect for property rights. Values matter.
So what could replace the US dollar?
So what about that long run? Well, if you agree with my basic thesis – that this is built on values and property rights – then I suspect that the biggest threat to US dollar hegemony is more likely to be bitcoin, or something like it.
There's a lot of utopian blather around cryptocurrencies, but the fundamental promise is an attractive one. Indeed, it's a currency rooted in precisely the values that underpin the US dollar and US democracy: secure property rights, freedom of individual action, and transparency without sacrificing privacy, to name but a few.
(Indeed, the ideal of bitcoin is so appealing that I've always thought that if you were a bad actor, and you wanted to find a way to undermine the status of the US dollar, you'd be hard pushed to find a better way to do it than to create something like bitcoin and then launch it during a world-shaking global financial crisis. But that's a conspiracy theory for another day.)
Anyway. Debasement – whether that be of the actual value of the currency or the philosophical values that underpin the currency – is a genuine threat to the reserve currency at all times. There's plenty of risk of that.
And you should certainly own some gold. It's a solid disaster hedge, it tends to do well when inflation surprises on the upside, and it will certainly stay in demand if authoritarian nations' central banks are looking for ways to diversify.
But Russia demanding payment for its oil in something other than US dollars? I just don't think that in and of itself, it's a big deal.
Feel free to disagree or point out where my reasoning has gone awry at editor@moneyweek.com.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/miscellaneous/604669/russian-rubles
via IFTTT
Gold Futures (GC!), H4 Potential for Bullish Upside!
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/gold-futures-gc-h4-potential-for-bullish-upside"
via IFTTT
Silver Futures (SI1!), H4 Potential for Dip!
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/silver-futures-si1-h4-potential-for-dip5"
via IFTTT
The IndeX Files 05-04-2022
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/the-index-files-05-04-2022"
via IFTTT
Wheat Futures (ZW1!), H4 Bearish Dip
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/wheat-futures-zw1-h4-bearish-dip"
via IFTTT
Soybeans Future (ZS1!), H1 Bearish Drop
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/soybeans-future-zs1-h1-bearish-drop5"
via IFTTT
Dax Futures (FDAX1!), H1 Potential For A Drop!
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/dax-futures-fdax1-h1-potential-for-a-drop5"
via IFTTT
Don’t count resources out
Commodities have performed poorly over the past year, but they tend to move in long and volatile cycles. from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://m...
-
The new strain of covid found in South Africa could disrupt plans by governments and central banks to rebuild economies. Financial markets a...
-
Fidelity “FIS” is a global financial services technology company and a leader in providing technology solutions to merchants, banks and cap...
-
Asian Equities Sink on Covid FearsIt’s been a mixed start to the week for global equities benchmarks with US and European asset markets rema...

