Wednesday, September 29, 2021
Dollar Down, But Losses Capped as Markets Enter “Twilight Zone”
from Forex News https://www.investing.com/news/forex-news/dollar-down-but-losses-capped-as-markets-enter-twilight-zone-2629270
via IFTTT
Dollar stands tall as traders brace for tapering
from Forex News https://www.investing.com/news/economy/dollar-stands-tall-as-traders-brace-for-tapering-2629204
via IFTTT
Tuesday, September 28, 2021
Too embarrassed to ask: what is moral hazard?
The term “moral hazard” was first widely used in the insurance industry in the 18th century. Put simply, it refers to a situation in which a person or institution engaged in a risky activity does not bear the full negative consequences of their decisions. This lack of consequences encourages them to behave more recklessly than if they were fully responsible for their actions.
Here’s an easy example. Let’s say you’ve insured your mobile phone. As a result, you don’t bother to buy a protective case for it. After all, if it drops on the floor and breaks, the insurer will pay. That’s moral hazard.
For a much more dramatic real-life example, consider the role moral hazard played in the financial crisis of 2008. In the early 2000s, the US housing market was booming. Investors lined up to buy bundles of US mortgages, which they saw as a low-risk way to get higher interest payments than they could get from US government bonds. They bought these mortgage bundles from the banks. The banks, in turn, made the bundles out of individual mortgages they’d bought from mortgage lenders.
Because there was so much demand, mortgage lenders paid their salespeople big bonuses to sell as many mortgages as they could. But because they were immediately selling the mortgages on to the banks, the mortgage lenders didn’t worry about how creditworthy the borrowers were. They just cared about their commissions. And because the banks were selling the mortgage bundles on to investors, they didn’t worry about the quality of the loans. They just cared about their fees.
In short, the people who issued the mortgages made a profit, and thought they had offloaded the risks to someone else. Then house prices fell, some homeowners stopped paying their loans, and the entire financial system nearly collapsed.
That’s moral hazard, too – when profits go to one group of individuals or companies, but losses are borne by the taxpayer as a group.
And moral hazard is still rife in the financial system. For example, central banks constantly step in and print money to prevent economic shocks from spreading. But that encourages investors to take more risk than they otherwise would.
Which just sets us up for a worse crash in the future.
On that cheery note, may I suggest you subscribe to MoneyWeek magazine.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/investment-strategy/too-embarrassed-to-ask/603905/what-is-moral-hazard
via IFTTT
US Open – USD, Oil & Yields Higher, Tech Stocks Sell-Off
USA100, H1
Fed Chair Powell will testify (later today) that the economy continues to improve, according to his written testimony released Monday. He will add that the labour market has gained too, but the pace has slowed the last several months due to the rise in Covid. Meanwhile, supply constraints are restraining some activities. He added inflation is elevated and is likely to remain so in coming months due to the reopening of the economy and bottlenecks in some sectors. He acknowledged that these effects have been “larger and longer lasting than anticipated, but they will abate and as they do, inflation is expected to drop back toward our longer-run 2% goal.”
The advance indicators report revealed an unexpected widening in the August goods trade deficit trade deficit to $87.6 bln from $86.8 bln in July and an all-time high of $92.0 bln in June. August exports matched assumptions, but imports beat estimates by $3.6 bln, leaving a big downside net export surprise via a wider than assumed August trade balance.
The rally in the USD continued in to the US Open with Cable being the biggest mover trading as low as 1.3530 from opening trades today at 1.3715, EM currencies came under the spot light too as USDTRY hit new all-time highs at 8.8876 and the Rand sank further as USDZAR hit 15.1100. US Yields were the main catalyst as the 10yr hit 1.54% and the 30yr broke over 2.00% and even tested 2.10%. This resulted in further selling of the interest rate sensitive technology sector as the USA100, sank under 15,000 and the main markets were all down over 1% at the US Open. USOil continued to rally on supply chain bottlenecks and inventory drawdowns and spiked over $76.00 earlier before cooling to $75.00.
Click here to access our Economic Calendar
Stuart Cowell
Head Market Analyst
Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
from HF Analysis /274014/
via IFTTT
EURUSD, GBPUSD may Need to Drop Lower to get Some Short-term Reprieve
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/eurusd-gbpusd-may-need-to-drop-lower-to-get-some-short-term-reprieve"
via IFTTT
The UK Energy Crisis Explained
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/the-uk-energy-crisis-explained"
via IFTTT
Market Spotlight: S&P Reversal Risks
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/market-spotlight-s-and-p-reversal-risks"
via IFTTT
The IndeX Files 28-09-2021
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/the-index-files-28-09-2021"
via IFTTT
Why are people panicking about fuel shortages?
Fuel has become the latest source of frenzy in UK markets. Drivers flocked to petrol stations over the weekend, with long queues forming through the nation’s cities, despite government efforts to convince the public that there is no shortage of fuel.
What’s going on, and will things get back to normal any time soon?
What happened?
Members of the Petrol Retailers Association, which represent roughly 65% of UK forecourts, say that panic buying left the taps dry at up to 90% of the UK’s 8,000 petrol stations on Sunday.
Cars queued at forecourts, prompting many petrol stations to shut down, unable to meet demand. BP said that the panic buying saw it run out of its two major grades of fuel on Sunday, forcing it and other forecourts to ration some supplies.
The panic buying and shortages come at an unsettled time. Last week also saw a massive surge in both UK natural gas and electricity prices hitting headlines, as well as a shortage of fertilisers and CO2, which is used in the manufacture of many products.
What is causing the fuel shortage?
The havoc in fuel markets stems from the shortage of lorry drivers. Last week, BP, along with some Esso-owned Tesco Alliance stations, said that it had to close petrol stations temporarily, because it did not have enough lorry drivers. This in turn prompted many drivers to scramble to petrol stations to fill their tanks, ignoring government advice.
How serious is the shortage and how long is it expected to last?
As a result of the chaos, almost 400 petrol stations, including those owned by Shell, Esso and BP, have introduced a £30 fuel limit to give customers a fair chance to fill up.
But is the UK’s fuel situation really as bad as people say? Ministers have been quick to deny claims that the UK is facing a national fuel shortage, with the transport secretary, Grant Shapps, calling the turmoil a “manufactured crisis”.
Unsurprisingly, several fuel providers, including Esso and ExxonMobil, released a statement with industry bodies stating there was no overall shortage of gas.
The UK’s business secretary, Kwasi Kwarteng, said: “We have long-standing contingency plans in place to work with industry so that fuel supplies can be maintained and deliveries can still be made in the event of a serious disruption.”
Boris Johnson’s spokesman echoed the view. “We have ample fuel stocks in this country – the public should continue to be reassured there are no shortages.”
What measures has the government taken to defuse the situation?
As a shortage of lorry drivers sparked the fuel crisis, so the government has taken measures over the weekend to attempt to fix it.
It announced a temporary three-month scheme, expected to last until Christmas Day, to make it easier for 5,000 foreign lorry drivers to work in the UK. Up to 4,000 people will also be trained as new HGV drivers to tackle skills shortages.
It has also temporarily suspended competition laws to enable oil companies to supply petrol stations more efficiently. Officials said the relaxed competition measures will allow the industry to share information more easily so that deliveries can be prioritised in regions which are experiencing more acute shortages than other parts of the country.
On Monday, environment minister George Eustice denied earlier media reports that the army may be deployed to help with fuel deliveries.
"We've no plans at the moment to bring in the army to actually do driving,” Eustice said. "But we always have a civil contingencies section within the Army on standby – but we're not jumping to that necessarily at the moment." However, this morning, the government said that army tanker drivers have indeed been put on standby.
Is this the first time the government has relaxed competition rules?
No, this is not the first time the government has done that. It also relaxed competition laws in March 2020, at the depths of the coronavirus crisis. That paved the way for retailers to share data on stock levels as well as share delivery vans and distribution depots, to ensure minimum disruption to vital supply chains during panic-buying last year when the pandemic kicked off.
What are the knock-on effects?
Edmund King, the president of motoring association the AA, said that there is “plenty of fuel at source”, and the situation will rectify itself in just a matter of days.
If that is true, given the government has already introduced measures to tackle the HGV driver shortage – the root cause of the fuel crisis – it is likely that higher fuel prices will only be temporary. But, that being said, consumers may still suffer short-term disruption and higher prices while the driver shortage persists.
From an investment angle, there are unlikely to be any ramifications due to the short-term nature of the fuel situation, but it is worth keeping an eye out on oil and gas companies.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/economy/uk-economy/603900/why-are-people-panicking-about-fuel-shortages
via IFTTT
Why investors should beware of corporate waffle
Corporate jargon is an irritating fact of life. But it can also damage your investment returns, if a new study is to be believed, reports John Authers in Bloomberg. Analysts at investment bank Nomura looked at the language used by top executives at America’s biggest listed companies (those in the Russell 1000 index) in conference calls discussing their annual and quarterly results, going back to 2014. They used a readability tool to rate the communications for complexity (readability tools analyse aspects such as sentence length and choice of words). They found a strong correlation between clarity and returns: share prices of the stocks whose executives used the clearest language in calls far outperformed those who waffled or used lots of impenetrable jargon.
This makes logical sense. If someone can’t explain their business strategy clearly, it usually means one of two things: either they don’t know what they’re doing, or they do know what they’re doing, and they’re trying to hide it from you. Neither is a good prospect for an investor. What’s more, the analysis backs up previous research into the relationship between corporate communications and earnings. For example, one study published in the Research in International Business and Finance journal in 2016, found that French companies that used more complex language in earnings reports also were more inclined to use debatable accounting techniques to make their results look better than they really were.
Lessons for investors
There are many examples of skilled communicators who have done well for their investors over the years. Warren Buffett’s annual letters to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders are perhaps the most-scrutinised corporate documents in investment history. In his own shareholder letters, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos also proved highly skilled at boiling down a complex business to some key strategic points. Here in the UK, fund manager Terry Smith is admired for his forthright views, while a large part of Simon Wolfson’s success as head of retailer Next is his commitment to explaining very clearly what the company is doing and why.
Yet you don’t need to hunt down CEOs or managers with exemplary communication skills. Here’s a simple test to carry out on your own portfolio right now. Look at your holdings. Are you confident that you could clearly explain to another interested investor what your reasoning is for owning each fund or stock? Try to sum it up in a sentence for each one. If you can’t, then maybe it’s a sign that it shouldn’t be in there – or at the very least, that you need to do more homework. Give it a go – I suspect you might be surprised.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/investments/investment-strategy/603898/why-investors-should-beware-of-corporate-waffle
via IFTTT
Ensign Group: profiting from US private care
The British government has incurred criticism for its decision to raise taxes in order to fund social care. But however the issue is ultimately dealt with, it will be a recurring theme over the next few years as populations age and require more looking after. And given this backdrop it’s no surprise that private care providers have attracted the attention of investors recently.
Shares in nursing and care-home specialist Ensign Group (Nasdaq: ENSG), for instance, have done very well over the past eighteen months, more than doubling from their lows in March 2020. However, over the past few weeks they have fallen back, and are now approximately 20% down from their peak in the early spring. Does this mean that all the investment opportunities have disappeared, or is this just a pause?
A fragmented industry
Ensign operates 250 US care homes employing 25,000 people in 13 states on a franchise model, with around two-thirds of its homes in five states: California, Texas, Arizona, Utah and Colorado. While this makes it the second-largest provider in the US, the fact that the industry is so fragmented means there is still plenty of room for expansion, and Ensign has been steadily growing its presence by buying up care homes. Even though Ensign spun off its home health and hospice division in 2019, its overall number of facilities has grown from 150 in 2015, and 223 in 2019 to 250 homes as of July 2021.
Ensign’s growth does not just come from increasing the number of homes but is also a result of growing the amount of money it derives from each home, with their average revenue and occupation rates increasing after several years of ownership. This success, combined with the overall growth of the market, which is set to expand by around 7% a year thanks to America’s ageing population, has helped Ensign grow its revenue by nearly 80% from 2015 to 2020, around 12% a year. The group’s earnings per share have risen nearly threefold during the same period. Both revenue and earnings are expected to carry on growing over the next few years.
Ensign’s other metrics also look impressive. Its operating margin increased from around 6% in 2015 to 9% five years later. It also makes good use of its capital, achieving a double-digit return on capital, a key gauge of profitability. This has allowed it to eliminate its net debt even as it expands. Furthermore, the fact that it trades on a 2022 price/earnings (p/e) ratio of 20 times, roughly the same as the overall US market, means it is hardly expensive in view of the growth opportunities in this area.
Still, Ensign’s Group’s share price has been in the doldrums, so I suggest you wait a little until it regains its momentum before jumping in. Go long after it reaches $85 a share, around 10% above its current price of $77. When it does reach that level, I recommend you go long at £40 per $1, with a stop-loss at $60. This gives you a total downside of £1,000.
Trading techniques: using circuit breakers
Since 1988, US regulators have sought to impose so-called “circuit breakers” on both individual shares and the overall market. Once the S&P 500 falls by 7% from its opening price, trading is halted for 15 minutes (unless it is late in the trading day), with another brief interruption once the S&P 500 declines by 13%. Finally, if the market falls by 20%, then all trading is halted for the rest of the day.
For individual shares in the S&P 500, a 5% fluctuation up or down in any five-minute period will cause trading in that share to be halted for five minutes, while there is a temporary short-selling ban on any share that has fallen by 10% or more in a single day. Those supporting circuit breakers argue that they can exert a calming effect on the market by giving traders a breathing space, reducing panic-buying or selling. Advocates also claim that breakers can prevent attempts to distort or manipulate the market.
However, critics argue that it not only interferes with the market adjusting to changes in the price that are the result of new information, but could also make a crash worse by depriving the market of liquidity.
For traders the big question is whether a circuit breaker represents a buying opportunity (once trading is allowed to resume) or presages future falls. According to a study by Concordia University in Montreal, US shares that fell by 10% or more between 2012 and 2015, thus triggering the short-selling ban, tended to perform roughly in line with the market once the ban expired, suggesting that circuit breakers are not a useful trading indicator.
How my tips have fared
It has been a poor fortnight for my four long tips. Three fell and only one appreciated. Media group ITV slid from 116p to 108p, homebuilder DR Horton decreased from $94.96 to $87.17 and construction firm Morgan Sindall slipped from 2,615p to 2,507p. The only bright spot was spread-betting firm Plus500, which increased from 1,400p to 1,416p.
Broker TP ICAP, US homebuilder PulteGroup and Royal Mail remain below the level at which I recommended that you should go long. Overall, my long tips are making a total profit of £3,253, down from £4,146 two weeks ago.
My six short tips have done better, with four going down, one rising and one unchanged. Electric-car company Plug Power fell from $26.40 to $25.72, digital currency bitcoin dropped from $51,253 to $43,075 and remote medicine firm Teladoc dipped from $144.56 to $136.
Cinema chain AMC also declined from $44.02 to $40.29. However, cloud-computing specialist Snowflake remain unchanged at $310 while electric carmaker Tesla increased from $706 to $730. Overall, my short tips are making a net profit of £109, compared with a loss of £360 a fortnight ago.
I now have four active long tips (ITV, DR Horton, Morgan Sindall and Plus 500) and six shorts (Plug Power, bitcoin, Teladoc, AMC, Snowflake and Tesla). I also have three pending long tips yet to reach the level at which you should activate them (Royal Mail, TP ICAP and Ensign Group).
I don’t advocate closing any of these positions, but I think you should cut the level at which you cover Snowflake and Plug Power to $325 and $40 respectively (down from $350 and $55) and raise the stop-loss on DR Horton to $70 (from $63).
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/trading/603897/ensign-group-profiting-from-us-private-care
via IFTTT
Salary sacrifice: how to earn less and save more into your pension
Pension experts are anticipating a surge of interest in salary-sacrifice schemes ahead of next April, when the chancellor Rishi Sunak’s 1.25% national insurance increase for employers and employees alike takes effect.
In a salary-sacrifice scheme, you agree to give up part of your salary in return for a different benefit worth the same amount. That might be anything from childcare vouchers to membership of a cycle-to-work scheme, but pension contributions are a popular option.
How salary sacrifice works
Typically, employees make pension contributions out of their wages before they are subject to income tax. This means you will pay national insurance on your earnings at the usual rates. In addition, your employer has to pay employers’ national insurance on your wages.
The effect of a salary-sacrifice scheme, by contrast, is to reduce your salary, with your employer paying the amount you give up straight into your pension scheme instead. National insurance, for both you and your employer, is then calculated on your reduced wages, resulting in lower bills for both parties.
Salary-sacrifice schemes have grown in popularity in recent years. Employers are especially keen on them because the schemes provide an opportunity to reduce their national insurance costs substantially. Some employers even offer to share these savings with staff, in the form of higher pension contributions.
With national insurance due to rise from 6 April 2022 in order to help fund the NHS and the costs of social care, these benefits will become even more attractive.
A basic-rate taxpayer on a salary of £30,000 will then pay £332.50 in income tax and national insurance on their final £1,000 of pay; assuming they then want to make a £1,000 pension contribution, £200 of that is covered by income-tax relief, but national insurance of £132.50 will still be payable.
By contrast, in a salary-sacrifice scheme, where the employee simply gives up £1,000 of pay in return for a pension contribution of £1,000, there is no income tax or national insurance to pay on the income forgone. In addition, the employer makes a national insurance saving of £177 under the new tax rates. Effectively, employer and employee share a windfall of £309.50.
Mind the drawbacks
There are some downsides to salary-sacrifice schemes. In particular, they reduce the value of benefits linked to your salary, such as life insurance cover and maternity and paternity pay.
There could also be an impact on the size of the mortgage you can secure, since lenders look at salary when making advances. Nevertheless, if your employer offers a salary-sacrifice plan, it will be even more worthwhile considering it now that national insurance rates are rising.
from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://moneyweek.com/personal-finance/pensions/603874/salary-sacrifice-how-to-earn-less-and-save-more-into-your-pension
via IFTTT
EURUSD H4 approaching pivot, potential for bounce | 28 Sept 2021
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/eurusd-h4-approaching-pivot-potential-for-bounce-or-28-sept-2021"
via IFTTT
DAX testing pivot, potential for a drop | 28 Sept 2021
from Tickmill Expert Blog - Forex Traders Blog https://www.tickmill.com/blog/dax-testing-pivot-potential-for-a-drop-or-28-sept-2021"
via IFTTT
Don’t count resources out
Commodities have performed poorly over the past year, but they tend to move in long and volatile cycles. from Moneyweek RSS Feed https://m...
-
The new strain of covid found in South Africa could disrupt plans by governments and central banks to rebuild economies. Financial markets a...
-
Fidelity “FIS” is a global financial services technology company and a leader in providing technology solutions to merchants, banks and cap...
-
Asian Equities Sink on Covid FearsIt’s been a mixed start to the week for global equities benchmarks with US and European asset markets rema...


